Closed editorialbot closed 2 years ago
@editorialbot set 10.5281/zenodo.6890240 as archive
Done! archive is now 10.5281/zenodo.6890240
@editorialbot set v1.1.0 as version
Done! version is now v1.1.0
@editorialbot reaccept
β @danielskatz β looks like the archive was incorrectly assigned here.
Rebuilding paper!
π Paper updated!
New PDF and metadata files :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/5237
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@domschrei<!--end-author-handle-- (Dominik Schreiber) Repository: https://github.com/domschrei/mallob Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: v1.1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@danielskatz<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @ARMartinelli, @massimotorquati Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.6890240
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@ARMartinelli & @massimotorquati, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @danielskatz know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
π Checklist for @ARMartinelli
π Checklist for @massimotorquati