Closed editorialbot closed 2 years ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.03 s (275.3 files/s, 135503.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia 2 149 252 2369
Markdown 2 88 0 265
TeX 1 43 0 255
YAML 1 1 4 18
DOS Batch 1 0 0 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 7 281 256 2908
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 2174
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1002/pc.23474 is OK
- 10.1590/S1678-58782012000200001 is OK
- 10.1007/BF01448839 is OK
- 10.1063/1.350236 is OK
- 10.1177/0021998318780209 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.006 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- Errored finding suggestions for "Reinforcement learning for Resin Transfer Moulding", please try later
- Errored finding suggestions for "NASA STRuctrual ANalysis (NASTRAN)", please try later
- Errored finding suggestions for "An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: T...", please try later
- Errored finding suggestions for "Liquid moulding technologies - Resin transfer moul...", please try later
- Errored finding suggestions for "Development of a next generation composite - Annul...", please try later
- Errored finding suggestions for "An Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Capacitive...", please try later
- 10.1016/0956-7143(94)90031-0 may be a valid DOI for title: Flow and rheology in polymer composites manufacturing
INVALID DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760311613 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.11.003 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.05.002 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.02.017 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.04.002 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(88)90006-7 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@obertscheiderfhwn can you check/fix those potentially missing/invalid DOIs? :point_up: You can check the references again by calling: @editorialbot check references
, and you can call @editorialbot generate pdf
to update the draft.
@obertscheiderfhwn I've waitlisted this submission just now since the editors in the domain are all busy handling other submissions. We will assign an editor once one becomes available.
@kyleniemeyer do you think you can help edit this one once you are available?
@editorialbot commands
Hello @obertscheiderfhwn, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1177/0021998318780209 is OK
- 10.1002/pc.23474 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.11.003 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1016/0956-7143(94)90031-0 may be a valid DOI for title: Flow and rheology in polymer composites manufacturing
INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1177/0021998318780209 is OK
- 10.1002/pc.23474 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.11.003 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot assign me as editor
Assigned! @Fei-Tao is now the editor
@obertscheiderfhwn if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
@helgee This paper is related to composites manufacturing, which belongs to aerospace engineering in general. if you'd like to review this submission, please comment here! Feel free to unsubscribe from this issue if you are not interested.
👋🏻 Hi, @ericneiva, @ketch,@bbrelje, @kylebeggs, @duhd1993 if you'd like to review this submission, please comment here! Feel free to unsubscribe from this issue if you are not interested.
@Fei-Tao Unfortunately, I don't have time the next few weeks. If it is still needed then, ping me again.
@Fei-Tao thanks for the invitation. I am afraid I won't be able to take on any review until the second half of September. If you still need me by then, do not hesitate to get back to me.
@kylebeggs @ericneiva, thank you for your quick response. I will wait for the other reviewer's response. I will let you know if I still need your help. Thank you for your time!
@Fei-Tao I don't think I have the appropriate expertise.
@ketch since finite area method is a variant of the finite volume method, I thought you have the expertise on this topic. Thank you for your prompt response. Have a good day.
Hi @Fei-Tao Thanks for the opportunity. I'd like to help with review the package and paper.
@editorialbot add @duhd1993 as reviewer
@duhd1993 added to the reviewers list!
@duhd1993 thank you for accept to review this paper. We will start the reviewing process after we find another reviewer.
@Fei-Tao I can do it
@bbrelje Great! Thanks for helping review this submission.
@editorialbot add @bbrelje as reviewer
@bbrelje added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4763.
Thanks everyone! Looking forward to your reviews in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4763.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@obertscheiderfhwn<!--end-author-handle-- (Christof Obertscheider) Repository: https://github.com/obertscheiderfhwn/RTMsim Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.1 Editor: !--editor-->@Fei-Tao<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @duhd1993, @bbrelje Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @obertscheiderfhwn. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@obertscheiderfhwn if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: