[PRE REVIEW]: POSSA: Power simulation for sequential analyses and multiple hypotheses

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@gasparl<!--end-author-handle-- (Gáspár Lukács) Repository: https://github.com/gasparl/possa/ Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.5.5 Editor: !--editor-->@fboehm<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @mingzehuang, @mmrabe Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3018b5213b07c69049bec226949b29f7"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3018b5213b07c69049bec226949b29f7/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3018b5213b07c69049bec226949b29f7/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3018b5213b07c69049bec226949b29f7)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @gasparl. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@gasparl if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.04 s (640.0 files/s, 218390.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                             4            144              8           3424
R                               11            115            664           1929
Rmd                              4            356           1369            245
TeX                              1             11              0            105
Markdown                         3             31              0             61
YAML                             2             11              6             52
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            25            668           2047           5816
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 339

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1002/ejsp.2023 is OK
- 10.1177/0146167220913363 is OK
- 10.5334/irsp.181 is OK
- 10.5964/meth.2811 is OK
- 10.1111/2041-210X.12504 is OK
- 10.1177/2515245920951503 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1016/c2013-0-10517-x may be a valid DOI for title: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[gasparl]

Here are some potentially fitting reviewers I found on the joss_reviewers list, in no particular order (actually the reverse order of occurrance on the joss_reviewers list, as suggested above): chrisaberson, sestelo, mingzehuang, sdparsons, mmrabe, mcavs, craddm, cimentadaj

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot invite @fboehm as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @fboehm, could you edit this submission?

[fboehm]

Yes, @kyleniemeyer - I'm happy to edit this submission. Thank you for the invitation.

[fboehm]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @fboehm is now the editor

[fboehm]

@gasparl - can you suggest several individuals who might be able to review this submission? please include their names and email addresses.

Thank you!

[gasparl]

Thank you @fboehm for taking the editorial role! Below are the reviewers I suggested above, now with names and email addresses – all found on the joss_reviewers list, given in no particular order (actually the reverse order of occurrance on the _jossreviewers list, as suggested above):

• chrisaberson (Chris Aberson; chris.aberson@humboldt.edu)
• sestelo (Marta Sestelo Pérez; sestelo@uvigo.es)
• mingzehuang (Mingze Huang; mingzehuang@gmail.com)
• sdparsons (Sam Parsons; sam.parsons@radboudumc.nl)
• mmrabe (Maximilian Rabe; maximilian.rabe@uni-potsdam.de)
• mcavs (Mustafa Cavus; mustafacavus@eskisehir.edu.tr)
• craddm (Matt Craddock; mcraddock@lincoln.ac.uk)
• cimentadaj (Jorge Cimentada; cimentadaj@gmail.com)

[fboehm]

@chrisaberson @sestelo @mingzehuang - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? Thanks!

[mingzehuang]

Hi, @fboehm, I'm happy to review it:)

[sestelo]

@fboehm as I mentioned by mail, nowadays I can't! sorry! best regards!

[fboehm]

Thanks so much, @mingzehuang ! I'll add you as a reviewer now. Once we find a second reviewer, we can begin the review. No problem, @sestelo ! I hope that we can work together on a future submission.

[fboehm]

@editorialbot add @mingzehuang as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@mingzehuang added to the reviewers list!

[fboehm]

@sdparsons @mmrabe @mcavs - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? Our reviews are checklist-driven. Please feel free to ask me any questions that you might have. Thanks for considering this!

[mmrabe]

Hi, @fboehm! I would be more than happy to review this submission.

[fboehm]

Thank you, @mmrabe! I'll add you as a reviewer right away. We can then start the review.

[fboehm]

@editorialbot add @mmrabe as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@mmrabe added to the reviewers list!

[fboehm]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4643.

[mcavs]

Hi @fboehm, the topic of the submission fits my research interest and I am willing to review.

[sdparsons]

Hi @fboehm sounds cool, I'm in to review :)

[fboehm]

Thanks so much, @mcavs and @sdparsons ! We've already found reviewers for this submission. I hope that we can work together on a future submission. Thanks again!

[sdparsons]

Sounds good, happy to work on a future review :)