search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
711 stars 38 forks source link

[REVIEW]: MSG: A software package for interpolating stellar spectra in pre-calculated grids #4602

Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@rhdtownsend<!--end-author-handle-- (Richard Townsend) Repository: https://github.com/rhdtownsend/msg Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: v1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@arfon<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @AWehrhahn, @ivastar Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.7559319

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/fdb605600d48545f98dfb9f825dc833d"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/fdb605600d48545f98dfb9f825dc833d/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/fdb605600d48545f98dfb9f825dc833d/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/fdb605600d48545f98dfb9f825dc833d)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@AWehrhahn, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @arfon know.

✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨

Checklists

📝 Checklist for @AWehrhahn

📝 Checklist for @ivastar

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨

Here's what you must now do:

  1. Check final PDF and Crossref metadata that was deposited :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/3915
  2. Wait a couple of minutes, then verify that the paper DOI resolves https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04602
  3. If everything looks good, then close this review issue.
  4. Party like you just published a paper! 🎉🌈🦄💃👻🤘

Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...

arfon commented 1 year ago

@AWehrhahn, @ivastar – many thanks for your reviews here! JOSS relies upon the volunteer effort of people like you and we simply wouldn't be able to do this without you ✨

@rhdtownsend – your paper is now accepted and published in JOSS :zap::rocket::boom:

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:

If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:

Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04602/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04602)

HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04602">
  <img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04602/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>

reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04602/status.svg
   :target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04602

This is how it will look in your documentation:

DOI

We need your help!

The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following: