[PRE REVIEW]: quadcleanR: An R Package for the Cleanup and Visualization of Quadrat Data

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@DominiqueMaucieri<!--end-author-handle-- (Dominique G. Maucieri) Repository: https://github.com/DominiqueMaucieri/quadcleanR Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@fboehm<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @ViniciusBRodrigues, @diazrenata Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/613731dfb5cfe31aad5ce73b88280f6b"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/613731dfb5cfe31aad5ce73b88280f6b/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/613731dfb5cfe31aad5ce73b88280f6b/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/613731dfb5cfe31aad5ce73b88280f6b)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @DominiqueMaucieri. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@DominiqueMaucieri if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.05 s (1179.5 files/s, 116809.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               35            328            897           1101
Markdown                         5            170              0            681
HTML                             1             90              5            518
Rmd                              4            430            310            479
YAML                             8             36             10            179
TeX                              1             15              0             99
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            54           1069           1222           3057
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 988

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1371/journal.pone.0130312 may be a valid DOI for title: Towards Automated Annotation of Benthic Survey Images: Variability of Human Experts and Operational Modes of Automation
- 10.1353/psc.2004.0021 may be a valid DOI for title: A rapid ecological assessment (REA) quantitative survey method for benthic algae using photoquadrats with SCUBA
- 10.3354/meps138093 may be a valid DOI for title: Estimating the abundance of benthic invertebrates: a comparison of procedures and variability between observers
- 10.2307/2257968 may be a valid DOI for title: Patterns in the balance of nature and related problems of quantitative ecology.
- 10.5962/bhl.title.56234 may be a valid DOI for title: Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation
- 10.2307/j.ctv2c3k261.15 may be a valid DOI for title: Defining the anthropocene
- 10.1038/nature22899 may be a valid DOI for title: Linking the influence and dependence of people on biodiversity across scales
- 10.1111/ecog.03148 may be a valid DOI for title: Disentangling biotic interactions, environmental filters, and dispersal limitation as drivers of species co-occurrence
- 10.2307/2845590 may be a valid DOI for title: Effect of quadrat size on measurements of species density

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@DominiqueMaucieri thanks for this submission. I am an AEiC with JOSS and here to process the first steps and to help assign an editor if this work is deemed in scope.

• [ ] Since you are the sole author, you can remove the statement (and associated YML) that authors contributed equally.
• [ ] Please check the above potentially missing DOIs. You can get our bot to check them again by calling @editorialbot check references.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@KristinaRiemer this seems like your cup of tea :tea: but you are handling several other submissions already. I'll label this as waitlisted for now but was wondering if you can help edit this once you are available? Thanks

[DominiqueMaucieri]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1371/journal.pone.0130312 is OK
- 10.1353/psc.2004.0021 is OK
- 10.3354/meps138093 is OK
- 10.2307/2257968 is OK
- 10.5962/bhl.title.56234 is OK
- 10.1038/nature14258 is OK
- 10.1038/nature22899 is OK
- 10.1111/ecog.03148 is OK
- 10.2307/2845590 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- 10.1080/0021213X.1984.10676984 is INVALID

[DominiqueMaucieri]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1371/journal.pone.0130312 is OK
- 10.1353/psc.2004.0021 is OK
- 10.3354/meps138093 is OK
- 10.2307/2257968 is OK
- 10.5962/bhl.title.56234 is OK
- 10.1038/nature14258 is OK
- 10.1038/nature22899 is OK
- 10.1111/ecog.03148 is OK
- 10.2307/2845590 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[danielskatz]

👋 @fboehm - Would you be able to edit this submission?

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot invite @fboehm as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[fboehm]

@danielskatz - yes, I'm happy to edit this submission! I'll start looking for reviewers.

[fboehm]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @fboehm is now the editor

[fboehm]

@DominiqueMaucieri - can you suggest several people who might have the background needed to review this submission? They can be from the JOSS reviewer list or they can be others. Thanks!

[DominiqueMaucieri]

@fboehm perhaps jhollist, SteveViss or ethanwhite

[fboehm]

@jhollist @SteveViss - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? Our reviews are checklist-driven. Thanks!

[fboehm]

@editorialbot list reviewers

[editorialbot]

Here's the current list of reviewers: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers

[fboehm]

@ha0ye @juanvillada @ViniciusBRodrigues @shaunpwilkinson - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? Our reviews are checklist-driven. Please feel free to ask me any questions if you're unfamiliar with our review process. Thanks!

[ha0ye]

I am not able to commit to any reviews at this time. Perhaps one of @gmyenni, @emchristensen, @diazrenata may be interested.

[ViniciusBRodrigues]

@ha0ye @juanvillada @ViniciusBRodrigues @shaunpwilkinson - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? Our reviews are checklist-driven. Please feel free to ask me any questions if you're unfamiliar with our review process. Thanks!

Hi there. I'm glad to help.

[diazrenata]

I am not able to commit to any reviews at this time. Perhaps one of @gmyenni, @emchristensen, @diazrenata may be interested.

I'd be happy to, if needed!

[fboehm]

Thanks so much, @ha0ye - I really appreciate the suggestions! And thank you, @ViniciusBRodrigues and @diazrenata ! Let me add you as the reviewers right now. Once I do so, I'll start the review thread. Please feel free to start your reviews once I've opened the review.

[fboehm]

@editorialbot add @ViniciusBRodrigues as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@ViniciusBRodrigues added to the reviewers list!

[fboehm]

@editorialbot add @diazrenata as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@diazrenata added to the reviewers list!

[fboehm]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4674.