[PRE REVIEW]: ρμ: A Java library of randomization enhancements and other math utilities

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@cicirello<!--end-author-handle-- (Vincent A Cicirello) Repository: https://github.com/cicirello/rho-mu Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v2.3.2 Editor: !--editor-->@diehlpk<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @xtruan, @pritchardn Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/00abc7048fe5b99d7c6fd848e0b773c4"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/00abc7048fe5b99d7c6fd848e0b773c4/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/00abc7048fe5b99d7c6fd848e0b773c4/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/00abc7048fe5b99d7c6fd848e0b773c4)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @cicirello. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@cicirello if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.13 s (450.9 files/s, 121141.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Java                            40            922           4599           8043
Markdown                         4            127              0            450
Maven                            2             34              0            419
YAML                             8             69             39            321
TeX                              1             22              0            226
JSON                             1              0              0             24
TOML                             1              5              8              5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            57           1179           4646           9488
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 848

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.21105/joss.02448 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00950 is OK
- 10.3390/app12115506 is OK
- 10.1145/3230636 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v005.i08 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v012.i07 is OK
- 10.1145/3147.3165 is OK
- 10.1093/comjnl/25.1.45 is OK
- 10.1002/9781119136378 is OK
- 10.1109/IROS.2017.8202133 is OK
- 10.1109/SSCI47803.2020.9308468 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compind.2019.08.004 is OK
- 10.1016/j.simpat.2020.102089 is OK
- 10.1080/01605682.2019.1678406 is OK
- 10.1109/ICEC.1995.489178 is OK
- 10.1109/PROC.1987.13916 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[arfon]

@editorialbot invite @diehlpk as editor

:wave: @diehlpk – would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot add @diehlpk as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @diehlpk is now the editor

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot invite @diehlpk as editor

wave @diehlpk – would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

Sure.

[diehlpk]

Hi @cicirello could you please recommend some reviewers?

[cicirello]

@diehlpk A couple years ago with a prior JOSS paper for a different library of mine, engnadeau was an amazingly good reviewer, providing just about the most useful constructive feedback I've ever seen. It looks like they changed their username--they are in the reviewer list as nnadeau (their username when they reviewed my prior paper), but current username appears to be engnadeau (definitely same person, as the new username is what currently shows on the issues and PRs they submitted on that other repo).

I'll look through reviewer list for some additional suggestions.

[cicirello]

@diehlpk Assuming that most recently added reviewers in the list might be more likely available, I started at bottom of the list. The following all look potentially relevant based on languages they have listed, etc: xtruan, pritchardn, imcatta

[diehlpk]

Hi @engnadeau do you have time to review this paper?

[diehlpk]

Hi @xtruan, @pritchardn, @imcatta do you have time to review this paper?

[pritchardn]

Hello, I'm currently giving a review for another JOSS submission (hopefully finishing soon), which may slow me down a little, but this looks interesting and I will gladly review this.

[xtruan]

Hi! I would be happy to review this, it looks interesting!

[engnadeau]

Unfortunately don't have time at the moment, just had a baby!

[cicirello]

@engnadeau Congratulations!

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot add @xtruan as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@xtruan added to the reviewers list!

[diehlpk]

Hello, I'm currently giving a review for another JOSS submission (hopefully finishing soon), which may slow me down a little, but this looks interesting and I will gladly review this.

Sure, take your time and finish the other review first.

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot add @pritchardn as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@pritchardn added to the reviewers list!

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4663.

[diehlpk]

Unfortunately don't have time at the moment, just had a baby!

Congratulations and hope you can deal with the lack of sleep.

[imcatta]

Sorry for the late reply. I am currently on vacation with limited internet access. For this occasion, I have to decline the invitation.