search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
715 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: PyGRASP: A library to reconstruct dynamic contrast enhanced MR images acquired with radial sampling #4670

Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@cariyurek<!--end-author-handle-- (Cemre Ariyurek) Repository: https://github.com/quin-med-harvard-edu/pyGRASP Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@emdupre<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @kerkelae, @curtcorum Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/800745f16160fae746c1b2498cd3e47a"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/800745f16160fae746c1b2498cd3e47a/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/800745f16160fae746c1b2498cd3e47a/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/800745f16160fae746c1b2498cd3e47a)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @cariyurek. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@cariyurek if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
emdupre commented 2 years ago

Thank you, @cariyurek !

Just to note : I am working on securing reviewers for this submission, and I will update this thread with reviewer invitations shortly.

emdupre commented 2 years ago

👋 Hi @Lestropie @grlee77 @michaelberks @spinicist !

Would you be willing to review PyGRASP: A library to reconstruct dynamic contrast enhanced MR images acquired with radial sampling for JOSS (the Journal of Open Source Software)?

You can learn more about reviewing for JOSS -- including our conflict of interest policy -- here.

The review takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and this short paper: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.04670/joss.04670/10.21105.joss.04670.pdf

If you're available to review this work, please let me know and I'll add you as a reviewer. Once I have sufficient reviewers I'll open a dedicated review issue.

Thank you !

emdupre commented 2 years ago

@cariyurek , a few editorial requests :

spinicist commented 2 years ago

This is very much my kind of thing but I am very overloaded at the moment.

I hope to have more time after the ISMRM deadline (9th November).

Lestropie commented 2 years ago

It's a little out of my comfort zone, and I wouldn't be able to commence until after the ISMRM DSGW next week. If you're still struggling to find better reviewers after a couple of weeks, I could have a look, but might be limited in what I can and can't be critical of. Keep me on the list of potential reviewers regardless.

Will ping a colleague who would be a good fit but doesn't appear to yet have a GitHub profile.

cariyurek commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

cariyurek commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

cariyurek commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot check references

editorialbot commented 2 years ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/TMI.2015.2509245 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.22446 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.22453 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.22172 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.24980 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.27021 is OK
- 10.1016/j.media.2020.101880 is OK
- 10.6084/m9.figshare.20465637.v1 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
cariyurek commented 2 years ago

Hi @emdupre ,

I hope we have fixed the editorial requests. Thanks for your time!

emdupre commented 1 year ago

Thank you @cariyurek for these edits, and @Lestropie and @spinicist for your responses !

One small clarification on your availability, @spinicist : Would you be willing and able to act as a reviewer for this submission given that the 6 week review window would run through the end of November ?

Please let us know, too, @grlee77 and @michaelberks, if you would be available to review this submission !

emdupre commented 1 year ago

👋 Hi @kerkelae @curtcorum !

Would you be willing to review PyGRASP: A library to reconstruct dynamic contrast enhanced MR images acquired with radial sampling for JOSS (the Journal of Open Source Software)?

You can learn more about reviewing for JOSS -- including our conflict of interest policy -- here.

The review takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and this short paper: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.04670/joss.04670/10.21105.joss.04670.pdf

If you're available to review this work, please let me know and I'll add you as a reviewer. Once I have sufficient reviewers I'll open a dedicated review issue.

Thank you !

kerkelae commented 1 year ago

Hi @emdupre :wave:, I'd be happy to review!

emdupre commented 1 year ago

Thank you, @kerkelae ! I'll add you as a reviewer now.

emdupre commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @kerkelae to reviewers

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

@kerkelae added to the reviewers list!

curtcorum commented 1 year ago

I can review as well, thanks!

On 10/14/22 15:52, Elizabeth DuPre wrote:

👋 Hi @kerkelae https://github.com/kerkelae @curtcorum https://github.com/curtcorum !

Would you be willing to review PyGRASP: A library to reconstruct dynamic contrast enhanced MR images acquired with radial sampling for JOSS (the Journal of Open Source Software) https://joss.theoj.org/?

You can learn more about reviewing for JOSS -- including our conflict of interest policy -- here https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html.

The review takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software https://github.com/quin-med-harvard-edu/pyGRASP and this short paper: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.04670/joss.04670/10.21105.joss.04670.pdf

If you're available to review this work, please let me know and I'll add you as a reviewer. Once I have sufficient reviewers I'll open a dedicated review issue.

Thank you !

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4670#issuecomment-1279453836, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANWQBVCBLYVBV4ZLCM3VJLWDHBXDANCNFSM56IHBIMA. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

--

Curtis A. Corum, Ph.D. Co-Founder/President Champaign Imaging LLC

www.champaignimaging.com "Bringing Next Generation Functional Neuroimaging from the Lab to the Clinic"

emdupre commented 1 year ago

Thank you, @curtcorum ! I'll add you as a reviewer now.

@Lestropie, I think we now have sufficient number of reviewers that we can proceed. Thank you, though, for considering !

I'll go ahead and close this discussion to open the official review issue 🚀

emdupre commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @curtcorum to reviewers

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

@curtcorum added to the reviewers list!

emdupre commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4865.