Closed editorialbot closed 2 years ago
π¨π¨π¨ THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! π¨π¨π¨
Here's what you must now do:
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
@tomfaulkenberry, @garretrc β many thanks for your reviews here and to @osorensen for editing this submission! JOSS relies upon the volunteer effort of people like you and we simply wouldn't be able to do this without you β¨
@IndrajeetPatil β your paper is now accepted and published in JOSS :zap::rocket::boom:
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04684/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04684)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04684">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04684/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04684/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04684
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Hey @arfon, the value for the archive is incorrect, it should be set to 10.5281/zenodo.7143971
and then reaccept the paper. Can you take care of this?
As reported here by @sdruskat
@editorialbot set 10.5281/zenodo.7143971 as archive
Done! archive is now 10.5281/zenodo.7143971
@editorialbot reaccept
Rebuilding paper!
:warning: Couldn't update published paper. An error happened.
The error is caused by the name of the directory containing the paper having a space in it : /JOSS files/
.
Please @IndrajeetPatil can you rename that folder?
@xuanxu I've done it
@editorialbot reaccept
Rebuilding paper!
π Paper updated!
New PDF and metadata files :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/5241
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@IndrajeetPatil<!--end-author-handle-- (Indrajeet Patil) Repository: https://github.com/easystats/datawizard Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 0.6.2 Editor: !--editor-->@osorensen<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @tomfaulkenberry, @garretrc Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.7143971
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@tomfaulkenberry & @garretrc, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @osorensen know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
π Checklist for @garretrc
π Checklist for @tomfaulkenberry