Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot set 10.5281/zenodo.7255839 as archive
Done! Archive is now 10.5281/zenodo.7255839
@editorialbot set v0.0.3 as version
Done! version is now v0.0.3
@editorialbot recommend-accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1137/080716542 is OK
- 10.1137/1.9781611974997 is OK
- 10.1561/2200000016 is OK
- 10.1007/s10851-010-0251-1 is OK
- 10.1117/12.766355 is OK
- 10.1002/cpa.20042 is OK
- 10.1137/09076934x is OK
- 10.1016/0898-1221(76)90003-1 is OK
- 10.1109/TIP.2017.2713099 is OK
- 10.1109/LSP.2017.2763583 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2203.17061 is OK
- 10.1109/MSP.2020.3016905 is OK
- 10.1007/978-0-387-40065-5 is OK
- 10.1561/2400000003 is OK
- 10.1561/2400000003 is OK
- 10.1109/iccv.2011.6126441 is OK
- 10.1109/TCI.2016.2599778 is OK
- 10.1109/GlobalSIP.2013.6737048 is OK
- 10.1090/s0025-5718-2012-02598-1 is OK
- 10.1109/TIP.2017.2662206 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/csism-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article
If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/3656, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept
@bwohlberg - I just have one small change from my proofreading: https://github.com/lanl/scico/pull/361 can you please merge this? Then we can continue the process.
Thanks @danielskatz. Your PR has been merged.
@editorialbot recommend-accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1137/080716542 is OK
- 10.1137/1.9781611974997 is OK
- 10.1561/2200000016 is OK
- 10.1007/s10851-010-0251-1 is OK
- 10.1117/12.766355 is OK
- 10.1002/cpa.20042 is OK
- 10.1137/09076934x is OK
- 10.1016/0898-1221(76)90003-1 is OK
- 10.1109/TIP.2017.2713099 is OK
- 10.1109/LSP.2017.2763583 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2203.17061 is OK
- 10.1109/MSP.2020.3016905 is OK
- 10.1007/978-0-387-40065-5 is OK
- 10.1561/2400000003 is OK
- 10.1561/2400000003 is OK
- 10.1109/iccv.2011.6126441 is OK
- 10.1109/TCI.2016.2599778 is OK
- 10.1109/GlobalSIP.2013.6737048 is OK
- 10.1090/s0025-5718-2012-02598-1 is OK
- 10.1109/TIP.2017.2662206 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/csism-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article
If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/3657, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept
@editorialbot accept
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
π¦π¦π¦ π Tweet for this paper π π¦π¦π¦
π¨π¨π¨ THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! π¨π¨π¨
Here's what you must now do:
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
Congratulations to @bwohlberg (Brendt Wohlberg) and co-authors!!
And thanks to @vitorsr, @DanNixon, and @lucaferranti for reviewing! We couldn't do this without you
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04722/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04722)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04722">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04722/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04722/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04722
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Thank you @danielskatz, @vitorsr, @DanNixon, and @lucaferranti!
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@bwohlberg<!--end-author-handle-- (Brendt Wohlberg) Repository: https://github.com/lanl/scico Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-paper Version: v0.0.3 Editor: !--editor-->@danielskatz<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @vitorsr, @DanNixon, @lucaferranti Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.7255839
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@vitorsr & @DanNixon & @lucaferranti, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @danielskatz know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
π Checklist for @vitorsr
π Checklist for @DanNixon
π Checklist for @lucaferranti