openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[REVIEW]: py2lispIDyOM: A Python package for IDyOM #4738

Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@xinyiguan<!--end-author-handle-- (Xinyi Guan) Repository: https://github.com/xinyiguan/py2lispIDyOM Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v.1.0.2 Editor: !--editor-->@faroit<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @AoifeHughes, @hayesall Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.7272236

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3f2e7b31cf9ee2f96ba631ff2617f8c5"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3f2e7b31cf9ee2f96ba631ff2617f8c5/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3f2e7b31cf9ee2f96ba631ff2617f8c5/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3f2e7b31cf9ee2f96ba631ff2617f8c5)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@AoifeHughes & @hayesall, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @faroit know.

✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨

Checklists

πŸ“ Checklist for @hayesall

πŸ“ Checklist for @AoifeHughes

editorialbot commented 1 year ago
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

🐦🐦🐦 πŸ‘‰ Tweet for this paper πŸ‘ˆ 🐦🐦🐦

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨

Here's what you must now do:

  1. Check final PDF and Crossref metadata that was deposited :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/3715
  2. Wait a couple of minutes, then verify that the paper DOI resolves https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04738
  3. If everything looks good, then close this review issue.
  4. Party like you just published a paper! πŸŽ‰πŸŒˆπŸ¦„πŸ’ƒπŸ‘»πŸ€˜

Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...

xinyiguan commented 1 year ago

Thank you @faroit for serving as our editor, and both reviewers @hayesall @AoifeHughes for your valuable comments and suggestions to make this package better! 🀘

oliviaguest commented 1 year ago

@xinyiguan congratulations! πŸ₯³ And yes, big thanks for reviewing and editing to @faroit and @hayesall and @AoifeHughes! ❀️

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:

If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:

Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04738/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04738)

HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04738">
  <img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04738/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>

reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04738/status.svg
   :target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04738

This is how it will look in your documentation:

DOI

We need your help!

The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:

faroit commented 1 year ago

@xinyiguan congratulations to the accepted paper πŸ₯³. I am very happy how this review process turned out. Both in terms of timing, quality of the reviews and the reactions/changes being made.

Thanks to @AoifeHughes @hayesall!