Closed editorialbot closed 2 years ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.08 s (815.7 files/s, 122101.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 36 1100 573 5870
Markdown 13 472 0 1527
YAML 5 33 5 182
TeX 2 11 0 120
make 3 34 7 95
JSON 5 0 0 47
reStructuredText 3 27 28 37
Dockerfile 1 3 1 7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 68 1680 614 7885
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 509
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.21105/joss.01848 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.21105/joss.01539 may be a valid DOI for title: pulse: A python package based on FEniCS for solving problems in cardiac mechanics
- 10.21105/joss.00224 may be a valid DOI for title: cbcbeat: an adjoint-enabled framework for computational cardiac electrophysiology
- 10.3389/fphys.2018.01431 may be a valid DOI for title: GEMS: A fully integrated PETSc-based solver for coupled cardiac electromechanics and bidomain simulations
- 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.03.008 may be a valid DOI for title: A model of cardiac contraction based on novel measurements of tension development in human cardiomyocytes
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon check references
My name is now @editorialbot
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.21105/joss.01539 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00224 is OK
- 10.3389/fphys.2018.01431 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01848 is OK
- 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.03.008 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
cmorris2945 mbarzegary storyetfall sdelandtsheer
Hi @AoifeHughes! Is this anywhere near your area of expertise?
@editorialbot invite @AoifeHughes as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
Sure, I'd be glad to handle as editor!
@editorialbot assign @AoifeHughes as editor
Assigned! @AoifeHughes is now the editor
Hi @cmorris2945, @mbarzegary, @storyetfall, @sdelandtsheer, as per the submitting author's suggestions would any of you like to / feel able to review this?
Sorry, what's the issue here? I don't know what a "DOI" is? This has to do with something about tagging electro-cardiac data or something?
hi, sure, will be a pleasure to help reviewing this submission.
Ok, what's the submission about?
Ok, what's the submission about?
@cmorris2945 You can read more about the submission here: https://github.com/ComputationalPhysiology/simcardems but in short it is a library for performing cardiac electro-mechanics simulations
Sure, I have time to review this submission later this week
@editorialbot add @mbarzegary as reviewer
@mbarzegary added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @sdelandtsheer as reviewer
@sdelandtsheer added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4753.
Fantastic @mbarzegary and @sdelandtsheer thanks for agreeing! We can get this show on the road :)
Ok, what's the submission about?
@cmorris2945 You can read more about the submission here: https://github.com/ComputationalPhysiology/simcardems but in short it is a library for performing cardiac electro-mechanics simulations
Ok, what's the submission about?
@cmorris2945 You can read more about the submission here: https://github.com/ComputationalPhysiology/simcardems but in short it is a library for performing cardiac electro-mechanics simulations
ok thanks
@cmorris2945 Sorry there must have been some confusion with the text in this issue — DOI is about references in the paper associated with this submission (Digital Object Identifier), not about the submission software itself. Looks like the submission has two reviewers so the review has begun, but thank you for your interest!
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@finsberg<!--end-author-handle-- (Henrik Nicolay Topnes Finsberg) Repository: https://github.com/ComputationalPhysiology/simcardems Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): master Version: v2022.3.0 Editor: !--editor-->@AoifeHughes<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @mbarzegary, @sdelandtsheer Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @finsberg. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@finsberg if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: