search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
707 stars 37 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: PyArabic: A Python package for Arabic text #4758

Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@linuxscout<!--end-author-handle-- (Taha Zerrouki) Repository: https://github.com/linuxscout/pyarabic Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: 0.6.15 Editor: !--editor-->@ajstewartlang<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @amitkumarj441, @kikarimullah Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/88253a3d82cca64ee32e88fc8925991b"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/88253a3d82cca64ee32e88fc8925991b/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/88253a3d82cca64ee32e88fc8925991b/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/88253a3d82cca64ee32e88fc8925991b)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @linuxscout. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@linuxscout if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 2 years ago 
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.28 s (134.1 files/s, 78789.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          24            717          14943           3658
Markdown                         3            193              0            689
reStructuredText                 3            243            298            415
TeX                              1             60              0            367
YAML                             3              4              5             50
make                             2             11             14             40
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            37           1236          15261           5245
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 655

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

editorialbot commented 2 years ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/ICICS52457.2021.9464614 is OK
- 10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130751 is OK
- 10.1109/ICICS52457.2021.9464531 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.1910.00421 is OK
- 10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.204 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.5121/ijdkp.2016.6602 may be a valid DOI for title: Improved microblog classification for detecting abusive arabic twitter accounts
- 10.1177/0165551519849516 may be a valid DOI for title: ASA: A framework for Arabic sentiment analysis
- 10.1109/wits.2019.8723864 may be a valid DOI for title: A Comparative Evaluation of Word Embeddings Techniques for Twitter Sentiment Analysis
- 10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.111 may be a valid DOI for title: Building a first language model for code-switch Arabic-English
- 10.1117/12.2242187 may be a valid DOI for title: Sentiment analysis of Arabic tweets using text mining techniques
- 10.1109/icics52457.2021.9464602 may be a valid DOI for title: Experience Simple Transformer library in solving Mojaz Multi-Topic Labelling Task
- 10.1007/978-3-030-33582-3_1 may be a valid DOI for title: Arabic text stemming using query expansion method
- 10.1057/s41599-021-00798-7 may be a valid DOI for title: Rise and fall of the global conversation and shifting sentiments during the COVID-19 pandemic
- 10.14569/ijacsa.2020.0111045 may be a valid DOI for title: MSTD: Moroccan sentiment twitter dataset
- 10.1007/978-981-15-0947-6_76 may be a valid DOI for title: Sentiment analysis approach based on combination of word embedding techniques
- 10.1109/fmec.2019.8795331 may be a valid DOI for title: Sentiment analysis of Arabic tweets in smart cities: A review of Saudi dialect
- 10.1109/icics52457.2021.9464566 may be a valid DOI for title: Scalable arabic text classification using machine learning model
- 10.1007/978-3-030-36778-7_22 may be a valid DOI for title: A Comparative Study of Feature Selection Methods for Informal Arabic
- 10.1109/icics52457.2021.9464605 may be a valid DOI for title: Detecting Regional Arabic Dialect based on Recurrent Neural Network
- 10.18280/ria.340111 may be a valid DOI for title: Hate Speech Detection on Multilingual Twitter Using Convolutional Neural Networks.
- 10.3390/app12094188 may be a valid DOI for title: Neural Embeddings for the Elicitation of Jurisprudence Principles: The Case of Arabic Legal Texts
- 10.11591/ijeecs.v19.i2.pp1010-1020 may be a valid DOI for title: Exploration of the best performance method of emotions classification for arabic tweets
- 10.1109/iciev.2019.8858561 may be a valid DOI for title: The effect of the similarity between the two names of twitter users on the credibility of their publications
- 10.11591/ijece.v12i4.pp4195-4205 may be a valid DOI for title: Dialectal Arabic sentiment analysis based on tree-based pipeline optimization tool
- 10.1109/icics55353.2022.9811149 may be a valid DOI for title: FluSa-Tweet: A Benchmark Dataset for Influenza Detection in Saudi Arabia
- 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108180 may be a valid DOI for title: Automatic Arabic Grammatical Error Correction based on Expectation-Maximization routing and target-bidirectional agreement
- 10.1007/s13369-021-05383-3 may be a valid DOI for title: A deep learning framework for automatic detection of hate speech embedded in Arabic tweets
- 10.3390/bdcc6020048 may be a valid DOI for title: A New Ontology-Based Method for Arabic Sentiment Analysis
- 10.1177/14604582211070998 may be a valid DOI for title: Hybrid machine learning approach for Arabic medical web page credibility assessment

INVALID DOIs

- None
danielskatz commented 2 years ago

👋 @linuxscout - note that your paper does not compile. Please follow the example paper and note that you can click on the error above to find out more about it. It appears that you should change the affiliation in line 12 from [1] to just 1. In addition, you could work on the possibly missing DOIs that editorialbot suggests, but note that some may be incorrect. Also, if any of these are in your .bib file but not actually used in this paper, please remove them. Please feel free to make changes to your .bib file, then use the command @editorialbot check references to check again, and the command @editorialbot generate pdf after making changes to the .md file or when the references are right to make a new PDF. editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.

linuxscout commented 2 years ago

Hi @danielskatz, I will work on it. thanks

linuxscout commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot check references

editorialbot commented 2 years ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5121/ijdkp.2016.6602 is OK
- 10.1177/0165551519849516 is OK
- 10.1109/wits.2019.8723864 is OK
- 10.1117/12.2242187 is OK
- 10.1109/icics52457.2021.9464602 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-33582-3_1 is OK
- 10.1109/ICICS52457.2021.9464614 is OK
- 10.1057/s41599-021-00798-7 is OK
- 10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130751 is OK
- 10.14569/ijacsa.2020.0111045 is OK
- 10.1007/978-981-15-0947-6_76 is OK
- 10.1109/fmec.2019.8795331 is OK
- 10.1109/icics52457.2021.9464566 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-36778-7_22 is OK
- 10.1109/ICICS52457.2021.9464531 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.1910.00421 is OK
- 10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.204 is OK
- 10.1109/icics52457.2021.9464605 is OK
- 10.18280/ria.340111 is OK
- 10.3390/app12094188 is OK
- 10.11591/ijeecs.v19.i2.pp1010-1020 is OK
- 10.1109/iciev.2019.8858561 is OK
- 10.11591/ijece.v12i4.pp4195-4205 is OK
- 10.1109/icics55353.2022.9811149 is OK
- 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108180 is OK
- 10.1007/s13369-021-05383-3 is OK
- 10.3390/bdcc6020048 is OK
- 10.1177/14604582211070998 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.111 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
linuxscout commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot check references

editorialbot commented 2 years ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5121/ijdkp.2016.6602 is OK
- 10.1177/0165551519849516 is OK
- 10.1109/wits.2019.8723864 is OK
- 10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.111 is OK
- 10.1117/12.2242187 is OK
- 10.1109/icics52457.2021.9464602 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-33582-3_1 is OK
- 10.1109/ICICS52457.2021.9464614 is OK
- 10.1057/s41599-021-00798-7 is OK
- 10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130751 is OK
- 10.14569/ijacsa.2020.0111045 is OK
- 10.1007/978-981-15-0947-6_76 is OK
- 10.1109/fmec.2019.8795331 is OK
- 10.1109/icics52457.2021.9464566 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-36778-7_22 is OK
- 10.1109/ICICS52457.2021.9464531 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.1910.00421 is OK
- 10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.204 is OK
- 10.1109/icics52457.2021.9464605 is OK
- 10.18280/ria.340111 is OK
- 10.3390/app12094188 is OK
- 10.11591/ijeecs.v19.i2.pp1010-1020 is OK
- 10.1109/iciev.2019.8858561 is OK
- 10.11591/ijece.v12i4.pp4195-4205 is OK
- 10.1109/icics55353.2022.9811149 is OK
- 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108180 is OK
- 10.1007/s13369-021-05383-3 is OK
- 10.3390/bdcc6020048 is OK
- 10.1177/14604582211070998 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
linuxscout commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

linuxscout commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

linuxscout commented 2 years ago

Can you help me to find the error in pdf generation?

linuxscout commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

linuxscout commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

linuxscout commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

linuxscout commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

linuxscout commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot commands

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Hello @linuxscout, here are the things you can ask me to do:


# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
linuxscout commented 2 years ago

Hi, @danielskatz, can I suggest reviewers as follow:

danielskatz commented 2 years ago

Thanks @linuxscout - the editor (once assigned) will decide on reviewers to invite

danielskatz commented 2 years ago

👋 @ajstewartlang - would you be able to edit this submission?

danielskatz commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot invite @ajstewartlang as editor

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

ajstewartlang commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Assigned! @ajstewartlang is now the editor

ajstewartlang commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @amitkumarj441 as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

@amitkumarj441 added to the reviewers list!

amitkumarj441 commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @amitkumarj441 as reviewer

Thanks @ajstewartlang for the review invitation. I will send my review in a week's time.

ajstewartlang commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @amitkumarj441 as reviewer

Thanks @ajstewartlang for the review invitation. I will send my review in a week's time.

Thanks @amitkumarj441 - I need to find a second reviewer before opening the review issue. If you could wait until I've done both of those things that would be great.

amitkumarj441 commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @amitkumarj441 as reviewer

Thanks @ajstewartlang for the review invitation. I will send my review in a week's time.

Thanks @amitkumarj441 - I need to find a second reviewer before opening the review issue. If you could wait until I've done both of those things that would be great.

That works for me.

ajstewartlang commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @kikarimullah as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

@kikarimullah added to the reviewers list!

ajstewartlang commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4886.