openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
725 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: PySwarming: a research toolkit for Swarm Robotics #4790

Closed editorialbot closed 2 years ago

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@mrsonandrade<!--end-author-handle-- (Emerson Andrade) Repository: https://github.com/mrsonandrade/pyswarming Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4f9aeeafa3bdc62c9bd4a1234f0c56f5"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4f9aeeafa3bdc62c9bd4a1234f0c56f5/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4f9aeeafa3bdc62c9bd4a1234f0c56f5/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4f9aeeafa3bdc62c9bd4a1234f0c56f5)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mrsonandrade. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mrsonandrade if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 2 years ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1226 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2003.812781 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03236 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463308005080 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2017.00012 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-018-9702-0 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2021.3072740 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.3390/s21062062 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AURO.0000033970.96785.f2 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2019.100565 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77612-3 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2016.7759558 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.3061366 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA46639.2022.9812417 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11721-012-0075-2 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
editorialbot commented 2 years ago
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.05 s (480.5 files/s, 73553.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           6            300            528            514
Jupyter Notebook                 2              0            643            499
Markdown                         3             83              0            215
reStructuredText                 6            115             36            198
TeX                              1             14              0            106
YAML                             2              7              8             47
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            22            531           1223           1614
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 896

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

arfon commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot query scope

@mrsonandrade – due to the small size of this code, the editors will now discuss if it meets the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. We should get back to you sometime next week.

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Submission flagged for editorial review.

arfon commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot reject

@mrsonandrade - thanks for your submission to JOSS. Unfortunately, after review by the JOSS editorial team we've determined that this submission doesn't meet our substantial scholarly effort criterion.

One possible alternative to JOSS is to follow GitHub's guide on how to create a permanent archive and DOI for your software. This DOI can then be used by others to cite your work.

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Paper rejected.