search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
700 stars 36 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: AMIRIS: Agent-based Market model for the Investigation of Renewable and Integrated energy Systems #4796

Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@KriNiTi<!--end-author-handle-- (Kristina Nienhaus) Repository: https://gitlab.com/dlr-ve/esy/amiris/amiris Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): 3-prepare-publication-at-joss Version: 1.2.3.3 Editor: !--editor-->@fraukewiese<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @sebastianboblest, @imcatta Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/21defae1052ec6fefd5e144dbef9cbf0"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/21defae1052ec6fefd5e144dbef9cbf0/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/21defae1052ec6fefd5e144dbef9cbf0/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/21defae1052ec6fefd5e144dbef9cbf0)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @KriNiTi. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@KriNiTi if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 1 year ago 
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.10 s (978.0 files/s, 94739.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Java                            76            809           1803           4939
YAML                             3             27             19            566
XML                              4              3              6            460
Markdown                         9            108              0            373
Python                           7             57            101            191
TeX                              1             27              0            185
Maven                            1              5              2            103
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           101           1036           1931           6817
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 896

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Failed to discover a valid open source license

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

arfon commented 1 year ago

@KriNiTi – please remove the extra licensing information at the top of you paper.md (it's breaking things) and format as you have for other related papers e.g., https://gitlab.com/fame-framework/fame-io/-/raw/139-prepare-publication/paper/paper.md

arfon commented 1 year ago

This is a joint/related submission to https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4794

fxnitsch commented 1 year ago

@KriNiTi – please remove the extra licensing information at the top of you paper.md (it's breaking things) and format as you have for other related papers e.g., https://gitlab.com/fame-framework/fame-io/-/raw/139-prepare-publication/paper/paper.md

Thank you @arfon for the notification. I fixed the paper.md accordingly.

KriNiTi commented 1 year ago

Dear editors, Thank you very much for these helpful processes. We suggest the following reviewers: BasTesterink zoltanmaric jordanperr

KriNiTi commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

arfon commented 1 year ago

@KriNiTi – thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

kthyng commented 1 year ago

@fraukewiese here is the third related submission.

kthyng commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot invite @fraukewiese as editor

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

fraukewiese commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Assigned! @fraukewiese is now the editor

fraukewiese commented 1 year ago

@BasTesterink , @zoltanmaric , @jordanperr – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The submission under review here is AMIRIS: Agent-based Market model for the Investigation of Renewable and Integrated energy Systems

dlr-cjs commented 1 year ago

Dear all,

I am now back from holidays, and, as corresponding author, I will now take my responsibilities and serve as primary point of contact for DLR. Thank you @KriNiTi and @fxnitsch for your efforts. Kind regards, Christoph Schimeczek

zoltanmaric commented 1 year ago

Hi @fraukewiese, sorry for the late reply. I'm not sure how I got nominated, as I don't really remember volunteering as a reviewer or any interaction with the JOSS. I apologise for the confusion, and I'm afraid I'll have to decline the review.

@KriNiTi can you perhaps shed some light on how I got nominated? Was it a typo? Cheers!

fraukewiese commented 1 year ago

Thanks for the reply @zoltanmaric . You are actually listed here: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers . So I guess you would like to be deleted from that list?

fraukewiese commented 1 year ago

@BasTesterink , @jordanperr – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The submission under review here is AMIRIS: Agent-based Market model for the Investigation of Renewable and Integrated energy Systems

fraukewiese commented 1 year ago

@dlr-cjs : Just in case: Do you have any additional suggestions for reviewer?

testerink commented 1 year ago

Hi, I registered many years ago as a reviewer when I was a PhD student. But with my current work I find it hard to fit in these reviews. So I think it's best if I'm removed from the list.

dlr-cjs commented 1 year ago

@fraukewiese : We are on it and will suggest some reviewers next week.

dlr-cjs commented 1 year ago

@fraukewiese : I hereby suggest two reviewers for AMIRIS. They aren't into energy research but both are experienced software engineers: @mvrueden and @SebastianBoblest

fraukewiese commented 1 year ago

@mvrueden @SebastianBoblest – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The submission under review here is AMIRIS: Agent-based Market model for the Investigation of Renewable and Integrated energy Systems

SebastianBoblest commented 1 year ago

Hi,

yes I can do that, but I will not be able to start the review before Dec 18th. I hope that is ok.

Best, Sebastian

fraukewiese @.***> schrieb am Mo., 5. Dez. 2022, 17:22:

@mvrueden https://github.com/mvrueden @SebastianBoblest https://github.com/SebastianBoblest – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The submission under review here is AMIRIS: Agent-based Market model for the Investigation of Renewable and Integrated energy Systems https://gitlab.com/dlr-ve/esy/amiris/amiris

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4796#issuecomment-1337656568, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARTHLZPKS2CKLWMLD6ZW4STWLYJD3ANCNFSM6AAAAAAQUQMTAE . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

fraukewiese commented 1 year ago

Sounds great. Thanks @SebastianBoblest !

I will add you as a reviewer now but won't actually start the review until we have a second reviewer signed up.

fraukewiese commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @sebastianboblest as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

@sebastianboblest added to the reviewers list!

fraukewiese commented 1 year ago

@mvrueden – would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The submission under review here is AMIRIS: Agent-based Market model for the Investigation of Renewable and Integrated energy Systems

fraukewiese commented 1 year ago

@dlr-cjs : I am currently trying to find an additional reviewer by mail. However, if you have any additional ideas who could review, please let me know.

imcatta commented 1 year ago

@fraukewiese if you haven't found a reviewer yet, I can volunteer. For transparency with respect to COI policy, I want to say that I am reviewing a related publication with some shared authors.

fraukewiese commented 1 year ago

@imcatta : Thank you very much! Sounds great. I will add you as reviewer and start the review.

fraukewiese commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @imcatta as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

@imcatta added to the reviewers list!

fraukewiese commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5041.

fraukewiese commented 1 year ago

@SebastianBoblest @imcatta – many thanks for agreeing to review here! See you over in #5041 where the actual review will take place.

zoltanmaric commented 10 months ago

Thanks for the reply @zoltanmaric . You are actually listed here: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers . So I guess you would like to be deleted from that list?

HI Frauke, I completely forgot about having done that. Unfortunately I think that was a bit of a too ambitious move on my part, so yes - I would prefer to get removed from the list please. Sorry for the trouble I caused.