Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.10 s (978.0 files/s, 94739.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Java 76 809 1803 4939
YAML 3 27 19 566
XML 4 3 6 460
Markdown 9 108 0 373
Python 7 57 101 191
TeX 1 27 0 185
Maven 1 5 2 103
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 101 1036 1931 6817
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 896
Failed to discover a valid open source license
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.
@KriNiTi – please remove the extra licensing information at the top of you paper.md (it's breaking things) and format as you have for other related papers e.g., https://gitlab.com/fame-framework/fame-io/-/raw/139-prepare-publication/paper/paper.md
This is a joint/related submission to https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4794
@KriNiTi – please remove the extra licensing information at the top of you paper.md (it's breaking things) and format as you have for other related papers e.g., https://gitlab.com/fame-framework/fame-io/-/raw/139-prepare-publication/paper/paper.md
Thank you @arfon for the notification. I fixed the paper.md
accordingly.
Dear editors, Thank you very much for these helpful processes. We suggest the following reviewers: BasTesterink zoltanmaric jordanperr
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@KriNiTi – thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.
For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!
@fraukewiese here is the third related submission.
@editorialbot invite @fraukewiese as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@editorialbot assign me as editor
Assigned! @fraukewiese is now the editor
@BasTesterink , @zoltanmaric , @jordanperr – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
The submission under review here is AMIRIS: Agent-based Market model for the Investigation of Renewable and Integrated energy Systems
Dear all,
I am now back from holidays, and, as corresponding author, I will now take my responsibilities and serve as primary point of contact for DLR. Thank you @KriNiTi and @fxnitsch for your efforts. Kind regards, Christoph Schimeczek
Hi @fraukewiese, sorry for the late reply. I'm not sure how I got nominated, as I don't really remember volunteering as a reviewer or any interaction with the JOSS. I apologise for the confusion, and I'm afraid I'll have to decline the review.
@KriNiTi can you perhaps shed some light on how I got nominated? Was it a typo? Cheers!
Thanks for the reply @zoltanmaric . You are actually listed here: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers . So I guess you would like to be deleted from that list?
@BasTesterink , @jordanperr – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
The submission under review here is AMIRIS: Agent-based Market model for the Investigation of Renewable and Integrated energy Systems
@dlr-cjs : Just in case: Do you have any additional suggestions for reviewer?
Hi, I registered many years ago as a reviewer when I was a PhD student. But with my current work I find it hard to fit in these reviews. So I think it's best if I'm removed from the list.
@fraukewiese : We are on it and will suggest some reviewers next week.
@fraukewiese : I hereby suggest two reviewers for AMIRIS. They aren't into energy research but both are experienced software engineers: @mvrueden and @SebastianBoblest
@mvrueden @SebastianBoblest – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
The submission under review here is AMIRIS: Agent-based Market model for the Investigation of Renewable and Integrated energy Systems
Hi,
yes I can do that, but I will not be able to start the review before Dec 18th. I hope that is ok.
Best, Sebastian
fraukewiese @.***> schrieb am Mo., 5. Dez. 2022, 17:22:
@mvrueden https://github.com/mvrueden @SebastianBoblest https://github.com/SebastianBoblest – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
The submission under review here is AMIRIS: Agent-based Market model for the Investigation of Renewable and Integrated energy Systems https://gitlab.com/dlr-ve/esy/amiris/amiris
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4796#issuecomment-1337656568, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARTHLZPKS2CKLWMLD6ZW4STWLYJD3ANCNFSM6AAAAAAQUQMTAE . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Sounds great. Thanks @SebastianBoblest !
I will add you as a reviewer now but won't actually start the review until we have a second reviewer signed up.
@editorialbot add @sebastianboblest as reviewer
@sebastianboblest added to the reviewers list!
@mvrueden – would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
The submission under review here is AMIRIS: Agent-based Market model for the Investigation of Renewable and Integrated energy Systems
@dlr-cjs : I am currently trying to find an additional reviewer by mail. However, if you have any additional ideas who could review, please let me know.
@fraukewiese if you haven't found a reviewer yet, I can volunteer. For transparency with respect to COI policy, I want to say that I am reviewing a related publication with some shared authors.
@imcatta : Thank you very much! Sounds great. I will add you as reviewer and start the review.
@editorialbot add @imcatta as reviewer
@imcatta added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5041.
@SebastianBoblest @imcatta – many thanks for agreeing to review here! See you over in #5041 where the actual review will take place.
Thanks for the reply @zoltanmaric . You are actually listed here: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers . So I guess you would like to be deleted from that list?
HI Frauke, I completely forgot about having done that. Unfortunately I think that was a bit of a too ambitious move on my part, so yes - I would prefer to get removed from the list please. Sorry for the trouble I caused.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@KriNiTi<!--end-author-handle-- (Kristina Nienhaus) Repository: https://gitlab.com/dlr-ve/esy/amiris/amiris Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): 3-prepare-publication-at-joss Version: 1.2.3.3 Editor: !--editor-->@fraukewiese<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @sebastianboblest, @imcatta Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @KriNiTi. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@KriNiTi if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: