search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
722 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: elapid: Species distribution modeling tools for Python #4812

Closed editorialbot closed 2 years ago

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@earth-chris<!--end-author-handle-- (Christopher Anderson) Repository: https://github.com/earth-chris/elapid Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-submission Version: v0.3.14 Editor: !--editor-->@graciellehigino<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @chrisborges, @gabrieldansereau Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ac415a024261efb3b397a1bad6f9cde6"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ac415a024261efb3b397a1bad6f9cde6/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ac415a024261efb3b397a1bad6f9cde6/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ac415a024261efb3b397a1bad6f9cde6)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @earth-chris. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@earth-chris if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 2 years ago 
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.21 s (198.0 files/s, 26269.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          16            794            944           1979
Markdown                        14            332              0            616
YAML                             7             25              9            254
TeX                              1             20              0            229
SVG                              1              0              0            161
CSS                              1              3              0             33
make                             1              9              5             27
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            41           1183            958           3299
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 1552

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 2 years ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.6968622 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6894736 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.2307/4072271 may be a valid DOI for title: The niche-relationships of the California Thrasher
- 10.1073/pnas.0901639106 may be a valid DOI for title: Niches, models, and climate change: assessing the assumptions and uncertainties
- 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02637.x may be a valid DOI for title: Eight (and a half) deadly sins of spatial analysis
- 10.1111/ecog.03049 may be a valid DOI for title: Opening the black box: An open-source release of Maxent
- 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2007.5203.x may be a valid DOI for title: Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation
- 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x may be a valid DOI for title: A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter
- 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x may be a valid DOI for title: A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists
- 10.1214/13-aoas667 may be a valid DOI for title: Finite-sample equivalence in statistical models for presence-only data
- 10.1111/geb.12684 may be a valid DOI for title: Paintings predict the distribution of species, or the challenge of selecting environmental predictors and evaluation statistics
- 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00172.x may be a valid DOI for title: Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many?
- 10.1111/ddi.13442 may be a valid DOI for title: Target-group backgrounds prove effective at correcting sampling bias in Maxent models

INVALID DOIs

- None
arfon commented 2 years ago

@earth-chris - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

earth-chris commented 2 years ago

Thanks for the notice, @arfon! I've added myself to the list of volunteer reviewers so I can be conscripted to help battle the backlog as necessary.

Recommended reviewers

From the volunteer list:

Additional:

kthyng commented 2 years ago

Hi @graciellehigino! I have been in need of an ecology-type editor and I see you are here! Are you interested in editing this submission?

kthyng commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot invite @graciellehigino as editor

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

graciellehigino commented 2 years ago

I'm happy to help! @editorialbot assign me as editor

danielskatz commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot assign @graciellehigino as editor

commands to @editorialbot need to be the first thing in a comment 🙂

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Assigned! @graciellehigino is now the editor

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

graciellehigino commented 2 years ago

@molgor - would you be willing to review this submission? 😄

graciellehigino commented 2 years ago

@chrisborges - would you be willing to review this submission? 😄

molgor commented 2 years ago

Hi Gracielle,I might have some time off but I’m not sure. What would be the expected timeframe at the moment?Cheers,JuanEl 1 nov 2022, a las 3:07, Gracielle Higino @.***> escribió: @molgor - would you be willing to review this submission? 😄

—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

chrisborges commented 2 years ago

Hi Openjournals/Joss-Reviews,

I am available to review Dr. Higino's submission.

On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 8:33 AM Juan Escamilla Molgora < @.***> wrote:

Hi Gracielle,I might have some time off but I’m not sure. What would be the expected timeframe at the moment?Cheers,JuanEl 1 nov 2022, a las 3:07, Gracielle Higino @.***> escribió: @molgor - would you be willing to review this submission? 😄

—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4812#issuecomment-1298387323, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJSDSX6WLXHRRIKZGM7UNULWGD5XJANCNFSM6AAAAAAQ2NOUUQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

graciellehigino commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot add @chrisborges as reviewer

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

@chrisborges added to the reviewers list!

graciellehigino commented 2 years ago

Hi Gracielle,I might have some time off but I’m not sure. What would be the expected timeframe at the moment?Cheers,JuanEl 1 nov 2022, a las 3:07, Gracielle Higino @.> escribió: @molgor - would you be willing to review this submission? 😄 —Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.>

Hi @molgor ! We'd have about 3 weeks for review once the review issue is open. If you agree, we can open it right away. I'll try to get a third reviewer in the meantime.

graciellehigino commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot add @gabrieldansereau as reviewer

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

@gabrieldansereau added to the reviewers list!

graciellehigino commented 2 years ago

Thank you very much for agreeing to review, @chrisborges and @gabrieldansereau! I really appreciate it. @molgor I'd very much like to add you to the review team, let me know if you are interested as soon as possible 😃

You can find reviewer guidelines here, together with all the review criteria.

I will start the review issue where you will find a copy of the manuscript, a link to the software repository, and a checklist. During the review, you can check to see if the software repository satisfies the items on the checklist. If not, we encourage reviewers to file issues against the submitted repository’s issue tracker. When you have completed your review, please leave a comment in the review issue saying so.

Happy reviewing!

graciellehigino commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4930.

molgor commented 2 years ago

Hi Gracielle,Sorry for my late response.I cannot do it at the momentBest wishes,JuanEl 14 nov 2022, a las 21:37, The Open Journals editorial robot @.***> escribió: OK, I've started the review over in #4930.

—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>