[PRE REVIEW]: InspectorCell: Finding Ground Truth in Multiplexed Microscopy Images

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@AndreGosselink@fboehm<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @suresh-lab, @cinnetcrash Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ebee9f66755a029ccb79b6112ad01ae4"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ebee9f66755a029ccb79b6112ad01ae4/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ebee9f66755a029ccb79b6112ad01ae4/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ebee9f66755a029ccb79b6112ad01ae4)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @AndreGosselink. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@AndreGosselink if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.11 s (722.4 files/s, 137148.7 lines/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                      files          blank        comment           code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           54           1883           2575           5483
SVG                               5             19              1           3995
reStructuredText                  9            150            129            344
Bourne Again Shell                1             38             53            176
TeX                               1             10              0            127
Markdown                          1             12              0             48
JSON                              2              0              0             32
YAML                              2              5             11             31
DOS Batch                         2              8              1             27
make                              1              4              7              9
HTML                              1              0              0              7
Bourne Shell                      1              1              0              2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             80           2130           2777          10281
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10/fqfn3j is OK
- 10/gdwtdq is OK
- 10/gkspmt is OK
- 10/gqxxsr is OK
- 10/gp65td is OK
- 10/f34d7c is OK
- 10/c44gd9 is OK
- 10/ghrgms is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 955

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

kthyng commented 1 year ago

Hi @danasolav! Could you edit this submission? It looks like you and the submission both involve working with images, but not sure if the specifics are close enough for comfort, so let me know.

kthyng commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot invite @danasolav as editor

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

danasolav commented 1 year ago

Apologies for the delayed response. I have to decline, as this is out of my area of expertise.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot invite @britta-wstnr as editor

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 1 year ago

@britta-wstnr do you think you can edit this submission? Thanks

britta-wstnr commented 1 year ago

As briefly discussed with @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, I unfortunately am not available right now for editing of this submission. Sorry!

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 1 year ago

@fboehm do you think you would be able to help edit this submission?

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot invite @fboehm as editor

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

fboehm commented 1 year ago

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman - yes, I'm happy to edit this submission.

fboehm commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Assigned! @fboehm is now the editor

fboehm commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot list reviewers

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Here's the current list of reviewers: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers

fboehm commented 1 year ago

@giraola, @Suresh-lab, @AoifeHughes @uellue @caldarolamartin @ziatdinovmax @vigji - would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? Unlike many reviews, JOSS reviews are checklist-driven. You can read more about the JOSS review process here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html. Thank you for considering this :)

suresh-lab commented 1 year ago

Sure, I'll review it.

K

From: Frederick Boehm @.> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2022 10:55 AM To: openjournals/joss-reviews @.> Cc: Karthik Suresh @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: InspectorCell: Finding Ground Truth in Multiplexed Microscopy Images (Issue #4836)

  External Email - Use Caution

- Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fopenjournals%2Fjoss-reviews%2Fissues%2F4836%23issuecomment-1317240750&data=05%7C01%7Cksuresh2%40jhmi.edu%7C35f333bc6414410616c508dac7eaf80b%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638042109255759829%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9gyzUEoCqNkkDm1wJs%2F%2Faz8BA%2FguDZyDQFbIrtdbY88%3D&reserved=0, or unsubscribehttps://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAI64N4X2XWAWXZTGBGPB73TWIT7WJANCNFSM6AAAAAARATA2PU&data=05%7C01%7Cksuresh2%40jhmi.edu%7C35f333bc6414410616c508dac7eaf80b%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638042109255759829%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=2YuLrcOmT1ZLbfC0wN%2FLuMLLJ%2F580%2Btg1y5KdfHBYGg%3D&reserved=0. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.**@.>>

uellue commented 1 year ago

@giraola, @suresh-lab, @AoifeHughes @uellue @caldarolamartin @ziatdinovmax @vigji - would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? Unlike many reviews, JOSS reviews are checklist-driven. You can read more about the JOSS review process here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html. Thank you for considering this :)

It looks a bit outside my area of expertise to review competently. Sounds like a nice project, though!

AoifeHughes commented 1 year ago

Sorry @fboehm, hands currently full with managing editor stuff - if you're still looking for people on Monday let me know, I could maybe squeeze it in if you're really stuck for reviewers.

giraola commented 1 year ago

Sorry @fboehm, I’m currently ooo until Nov 22.

On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 04:10 Aoife Hughes @.***> wrote:

Sorry @fboehm https://github.com/fboehm, hands currently full with managing editor stuff - if you're still looking for people on Monday let me know, I could maybe squeeze it in if you're really stuck for reviewers.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4836#issuecomment-1318315502, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD7JICKBESHCQMAMEPQFVYTWIXY6JANCNFSM6AAAAAARATA2PU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

--

Gregorio Iraola, Ph.D.

Group Leader Microbial Genomics Lab http://iraola-lab.com Institut Pasteur Montevideo Mataojo 2020, Montevideo, Uruguay

International Fellow https://www.sanger.ac.uk/people/faculty/international-fellows/wellcome-international-fellow-dr-gregorio-iraola Wellcome Sanger Institute CB10 1SA, Hinxton, United Kingdom

Adjunct International Professor Center for Integrative Biology https://cib.umayor.cl/en/investigator Universidad Mayor Santiago de Chile, Chile

fboehm commented 1 year ago

Thanks for the replies, @giraola, @AoifeHughes @uellue and @suresh-lab. @suresh-lab - I'll add you as a reviewer in a moment. Once we find a second reviewer, we can officially start the review. Thanks so much!

fboehm commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot assign @suresh-lab as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

fboehm commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot commands

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Hello @fboehm, here are the things you can ask me to do:


# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot add @username as reviewer

# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@editorialbot assign @username as editor

# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@editorialbot remove editor

# Remind an author, a reviewer or the editor to return to a review after a 
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for version
@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version

# Set a value for archive
@editorialbot set 10.21105/zenodo.12345 as archive

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Set a value for repository
@editorialbot set https://github.com/organization/repo as repository

# Mention the EiCs for the correct track
@editorialbot ping track-eic

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Recommends the submission for acceptance
@editorialbot recommend-accept

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Flag submission with questionable scope
@editorialbot query scope

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

# Open the review issue
@editorialbot start review

fboehm commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @suresh-lab as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

@suresh-lab added to the reviewers list!

fboehm commented 1 year ago

@cinnetcrash @vinisalazar @jwdebelius @sganesh5 @jonatanalvelid @kapsakcj - would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS?

Unlike many reviews, JOSS reviews are checklist-driven. You can read more about the JOSS review process here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html. Thank you for considering this.

fboehm commented 1 year ago

Please feel free to reply in the thread if you can review. Thanks again!

fboehm commented 1 year ago

@cinnetcrash - are you saying that you're available to review this submission? Please reply in the thread. Thanks again!

cinnetcrash commented 1 year ago

@fboehm Yes, absolutely. Sorry I was not able to write. Thank you gor taking it forward. Cheers

fboehm commented 1 year ago

Cool! Thanks, @cinnetcrash! I'll add you as a reviewer now. We can then start the review.

fboehm commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @cinnetcrash as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

@cinnetcrash added to the reviewers list!

fboehm commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4949.

openjournals / joss-reviews

[PRE REVIEW]: InspectorCell: Finding Ground Truth in Multiplexed Microscopy Images #4836

Status

--

Adjunct International Professor Center for Integrative Biology https://cib.umayor.cl/en/investigator Universidad Mayor Santiago de Chile, Chile