matteocao
commented
1 year ago Thank you All!
I really love this approach to peer reviews: fully transparent, useful, serious and friendly at the same time. I think JOSS is really bringing a breath of fresh air into the world of publications and imho many publishers should follow this virtuous example!
Congrats for the great journal!
Cheers! 🥂
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@matteocao<!--end-author-handle-- (Matteo Caorsi) Repository: https://github.com/giotto-ai/giotto-deep Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: v0.0.3 Editor: !--editor-->@osorensen<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @EduPH, @leotrs, @ismailguzel Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.7243721
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@EduPH & @leotrs & @ismailguzel, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @osorensen know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
📝 Checklist for @EduPH
📝 Checklist for @leotrs
📝 Checklist for @ismailguzel