openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: DTCC Builder: A mesh generator for automatic, efficient, and robust mesh generation for large-scale city modeling and simulation #4875

Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@alogg<!--end-author-handle-- (Anders Logg) Repository: https://gitlab.com/dtcc-platform/dtcc-builder.git Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-2022 Version: 1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@crvernon<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @pralitp, @ifthompson Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ea3e547804d0e1b730751428da2184a1"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ea3e547804d0e1b730751428da2184a1/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ea3e547804d0e1b730751428da2184a1/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ea3e547804d0e1b730751428da2184a1)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @alogg. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@alogg if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
danielskatz commented 2 years ago

great, thanks! I'll assign it to you, just to officially move it from my list to yours

danielskatz commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot assign @crvernon as editor

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

Assigned! @crvernon is now the editor

crvernon commented 2 years ago

:wave: @alogg - The first step in this pre-review is to find at least 2 reviewers. If you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

alogg commented 2 years ago

@crvernon The following list of people match the criteria C++ and *mesh*:

paras.kumar@fau.de
mahadevan@anl.gov
keithrbt0@gmail.com
cedric.chevalier@cea.fr
crvernon commented 2 years ago

:wave: @KParas - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

crvernon commented 2 years ago

:wave: @krober10nd - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

KParas commented 2 years ago

@crvernon Thanks for reaching out. The topic is really interesting for me, but I could only take this up after January due to my current time schedule.

krober10nd commented 2 years ago

@crvernon Same here as KParas. Very busy and won't have time to review until Jan-Feb.

crvernon commented 2 years ago

Thanks @krober10nd and @KParas I'll keep you in mind for future reviews!

crvernon commented 2 years ago

:wave: @Puumanamana - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

crvernon commented 2 years ago

πŸ‘‹ @pralitp - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

pralitp commented 2 years ago

Sure, @crvernon I would be glad to review this

crvernon commented 2 years ago

Great, @pralitp I'll find another reviewer and kick things off into full review ASAP.

crvernon commented 2 years ago

@editorialbot add @pralitp as reviewer

editorialbot commented 2 years ago

@pralitp added to the reviewers list!

danielskatz commented 1 year ago

πŸ‘‹ @crvernon - Any news on finding a second reviewer?

crvernon commented 1 year ago

@danielskatz working on it in my network of folks. I think I may have found someone. I'll hear back for sure tomorrow one way or the other.

crvernon commented 1 year ago

:wave: @ifthompson - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

ifthompson commented 1 year ago

Sure thing πŸ‘

crvernon commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @ifthompson as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

@ifthompson added to the reviewers list!

crvernon commented 1 year ago

:wave: - Alright @alogg, @pralitp, @ifthompson I am going to close this Pre-Review and kick off the full review which you should receive a notification for. Thanks!

crvernon commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4928.