Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago
great, thanks! I'll assign it to you, just to officially move it from my list to yours
@editorialbot assign @crvernon as editor
Assigned! @crvernon is now the editor
:wave: @alogg - The first step in this pre-review is to find at least 2 reviewers. If you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
@crvernon The following list of people match the criteria C++ and *mesh*
:
paras.kumar@fau.de
mahadevan@anl.gov
keithrbt0@gmail.com
cedric.chevalier@cea.fr
:wave: @KParas - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
:wave: @krober10nd - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
@crvernon Thanks for reaching out. The topic is really interesting for me, but I could only take this up after January due to my current time schedule.
@crvernon Same here as KParas. Very busy and won't have time to review until Jan-Feb.
Thanks @krober10nd and @KParas I'll keep you in mind for future reviews!
:wave: @Puumanamana - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
π @pralitp - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
Sure, @crvernon I would be glad to review this
Great, @pralitp I'll find another reviewer and kick things off into full review ASAP.
@editorialbot add @pralitp as reviewer
@pralitp added to the reviewers list!
π @crvernon - Any news on finding a second reviewer?
@danielskatz working on it in my network of folks. I think I may have found someone. I'll hear back for sure tomorrow one way or the other.
:wave: @ifthompson - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
Sure thing π
@editorialbot add @ifthompson as reviewer
@ifthompson added to the reviewers list!
:wave: - Alright @alogg, @pralitp, @ifthompson I am going to close this Pre-Review and kick off the full review which you should receive a notification for. Thanks!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4928.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@alogg<!--end-author-handle-- (Anders Logg) Repository: https://gitlab.com/dtcc-platform/dtcc-builder.git Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-2022 Version: 1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@crvernon<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @pralitp, @ifthompson Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @alogg. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@alogg if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: