search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
708 stars 37 forks source link

[REVIEW]: IGraph/M: graph theory and network analysis for Mathematica #4899

Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@szhorvat<!--end-author-handle-- (Szabolcs Horvát) Repository: https://github.com/szhorvat/IGraphM Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-paper Version: 0.6.5 Editor: !--editor-->@prashjha<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @leotrs, @pitsianis Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.7469228

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/09bbc9ab112fb0a9326a21b42e56a14d"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/09bbc9ab112fb0a9326a21b42e56a14d/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/09bbc9ab112fb0a9326a21b42e56a14d/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/09bbc9ab112fb0a9326a21b42e56a14d)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@leotrs & @pitsianis, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @prashjha know.

✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨

Checklists

📝 Checklist for @pitsianis

📝 Checklist for @leotrs

editorialbot commented 1 year ago 
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
editorialbot commented 1 year ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1017/CBO9781139164849 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3630268 is OK
- 10.1016/j.entcs.2011.06.003 is OK
- 10.1088/2632-072X/abced5 is OK
- 10.1016/j.dam.2006.07.016 is OK
- 10.1016/0031-3203(80)90066-7 is OK
- 10.1016/B978-0-444-87806-9.50013-X is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:wave: @openjournals/csism-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.

Check final proof :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article

If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/3857, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept

danielskatz commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot accept

editorialbot commented 1 year ago 
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

🐦🐦🐦 👉 Tweet for this paper 👈 🐦🐦🐦

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

🐘🐘🐘 👉 Toot for this paper 👈 🐘🐘🐘

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨

Here's what you must now do:

  1. Check final PDF and Crossref metadata that was deposited :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/3858
  2. Wait a couple of minutes, then verify that the paper DOI resolves https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04899
  3. If everything looks good, then close this review issue.
  4. Party like you just published a paper! 🎉🌈🦄💃👻🤘

Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...

danielskatz commented 1 year ago

@szhorvat - even though I've accepted this (which is in progress), I now see that the zenodo archive's metadata doesn't have any authors besides you. Can you please edit the metadata (which doesn't require a new file or change the DOI) to include all the authors of the papers?

szhorvat commented 1 year ago

@danielskatz This is now done. https://zenodo.org/record/7469228

danielskatz commented 1 year ago

Congratulations to @szhorvat (Szabolcs Horvát) and co-authors!!

And thanks to @leotrs and @pitsianis for reviewing, and to @prashjha for editing! We couldn't do this without you

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:

If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:

Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04899/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04899)

HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04899">
  <img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04899/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>

reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04899/status.svg
   :target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04899

This is how it will look in your documentation:

DOI

We need your help!

The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following: