openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
713 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: FuseMedML: a framework for accelerated discovery in machine learning based biomedicine #4940

Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@alex-golts<!--end-author-handle-- (Alex Golts) Repository: https://github.com/BiomedSciAI/fuse-med-ml Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss_paper Version: 0.2.8 Editor: !--editor-->@jmschrei<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @anupamajha1, @suragnair Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4d0c5f077e6bc1ddc4c75e75774ce976"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4d0c5f077e6bc1ddc4c75e75774ce976/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4d0c5f077e6bc1ddc4c75e75774ce976/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4d0c5f077e6bc1ddc4c75e75774ce976)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @alex-golts. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@alex-golts if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 1 year ago
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=1.07 s (220.4 files/s, 83389.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON                             2              0              0          58591
Python                         193           4330           6493          15333
Markdown                        24            492              0           1457
Jupyter Notebook                 3              0           1134            502
TeX                              1             19              0            142
YAML                             6             11             10            126
Bourne Shell                     4             33             22            118
INI                              1             14              0             92
TOML                             1              1              0              2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           235           4900           7659          76363
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 1076

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 1 year ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1117/12.2609385 is OK
- 10.1117/12.2613169 is OK
- 10.3390/cancers14163848 is OK
- 10.1148/radiol.220027 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1007/978-3-030-87592-3_4 may be a valid DOI for title: A Glimpse into the Future: Disease Progression Simulation for Breast Cancer in Mammograms
- 10.1007/978-3-030-87589-3_29 may be a valid DOI for title: Pre-biopsy Multi-class Classification of Breast Lesion Pathology in Mammograms

INVALID DOIs

- None
Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot invite @jmschrei as editor

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 1 year ago

@jmschrei this sounds like your cup of tea :tea:, are you able to help edit this one? Thanks

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 1 year ago

@alex-golts thanks for this submission to JOSS. I am the AEiC for this track and have started looking for a handling editor. While we are waiting for an editor to pick this up, please work on the following:

jmschrei commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Assigned! @jmschrei is now the editor

jmschrei commented 1 year ago

I'll start finding reviewers after those two issues are resolved.

editorialbot commented 1 year ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1117/12.2609385 is OK
- 10.1117/12.2613169 is OK
- 10.3390/cancers14163848 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-87592-3_4 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-87589-3_29 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-98385-7_14 is OK
- 10.1148/radiol.220027 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
alex-golts commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot check references

alex-golts commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 1 year ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1117/12.2609385 is OK
- 10.1117/12.2613169 is OK
- 10.3390/cancers14163848 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-87592-3_4 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-87589-3_29 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-98385-7_14 is OK
- 10.1148/radiol.220027 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

alex-golts commented 1 year ago

@alex-golts thanks for this submission to JOSS. I am the AEiC for this track and have started looking for a handling editor. While we are waiting for an editor to pick this up, please work on the following:

  • [x] check those potentially missing DOI's ☝️ , you can call @editorialbot check references to check them again, and use @editorialbot generate pdf to update the paper draft.
  • [x] Can you add the city to your affiliation?

done, thank you!

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 1 year ago

@jmschrei looks good to me now.

jmschrei commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add anupamajha1 as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

I can't add that reviewer: anupamajha1 is not a username

jmschrei commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @anupamajha1 as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

@anupamajha1 added to the reviewers list!

jmschrei commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @suragnair as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

@suragnair added to the reviewers list!

jmschrei commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4943.