search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
722 stars 38 forks source link

[REVIEW]: FuseMedML: a framework for accelerated discovery in machine learning based biomedicine #4943

Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@alex-golts<!--end-author-handle-- (Alex Golts) Repository: https://github.com/BiomedSciAI/fuse-med-ml Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss_paper Version: 0.2.9 Editor: !--editor-->@jmschrei<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @anupamajha1, @suragnair Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.7346694

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4d0c5f077e6bc1ddc4c75e75774ce976"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4d0c5f077e6bc1ddc4c75e75774ce976/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4d0c5f077e6bc1ddc4c75e75774ce976/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4d0c5f077e6bc1ddc4c75e75774ce976)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@anupamajha1 & @suragnair, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @jmschrei know.

✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨

Checklists

📝 Checklist for @suragnair

📝 Checklist for @anupamajha1

alex-golts commented 1 year ago

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman we fixed the typos, thanks for pointing them out. we also edited the title, author list and license on Zenodo according to your comments. please let me know if you have more comments.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot accept

editorialbot commented 1 year ago 
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

🐦🐦🐦 👉 Tweet for this paper 👈 🐦🐦🐦

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

🐘🐘🐘 👉 Toot for this paper 👈 🐘🐘🐘

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨

Here's what you must now do:

  1. Check final PDF and Crossref metadata that was deposited :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/3901
  2. Wait a couple of minutes, then verify that the paper DOI resolves https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04943
  3. If everything looks good, then close this review issue.
  4. Party like you just published a paper! 🎉🌈🦄💃👻🤘

Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 1 year ago

@alex-golts congratulations on this publication in JOSS!

Thank you for editing this one @jmschrei !

And a special thank you to the reviewers @anupamajha1 and @suragnair !!!

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:

If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:

Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04943/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04943)

HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04943">
  <img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04943/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>

reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.04943/status.svg
   :target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04943

This is how it will look in your documentation:

DOI

We need your help!

The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:

alex-golts commented 1 year ago

Thank you all for the thorough and helpful reviews and for the editorial work! it was a great experience to go through the unique thoughtful and transparent review process of JOSS. we feel it definitely helped us improve both the paper and code.