[PRE REVIEW]: Biosiglive: an Open Source Python Package for Real-time Biosignal Processing.

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@aceglia<!--end-author-handle-- (Amedeo Ceglia) Repository: https://github.com/pyomeca/biosiglive Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v2.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @finsberg, @marcoghislieri Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e922a6e12b545789fca5d89648e9f1f5"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e922a6e12b545789fca5d89648e9f1f5/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e922a6e12b545789fca5d89648e9f1f5/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e922a6e12b545789fca5d89648e9f1f5)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @aceglia. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@aceglia if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.23 s (229.2 files/s, 272850.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XML                             16              0              0          57346
Python                          34            458           1379           3557
Markdown                         2             47              0            242
TeX                              1              6              0             65
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            53            511           1379          61210
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 959

[editorialbot]

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

[aceglia]

Suggested reviewers : from the list: marcoghislieri, melund outside the list: modenaxe (Luca Modenese)

[arfon]

@aceglia – this PR should fix your paper compilation: https://github.com/pyomeca/biosiglive/pull/3

[aceglia]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[aceglia]

@arfon Thanks for the PR I included the modifications in another opened PR. The compilation works well.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot invite @danasolav as editor

Dana do you think you can handle this one? I see you are handling several others already, if you are too busy let me know then I'll take it myself. Thanks

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@aceglia thanks for this submission. A quick comment, check your title, perhaps (correct me if I'm wrong) it should be written:

Biosiglive: an Open Source Python Package for Real-Rime Biosignal Processing.

i.e. I removed the plural on sources and biosignals, and I added capital letters throughout (as it previously was only used for Open Source, alternatively remove the other capital letters too).

[aceglia]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman You are completely right, the title should be : Biosiglive: an Open-Source Python Package for Real-Time Biosignal Processing What can I do to address this? Thanks!

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@aceglia I have changed the title of this issue just now. Next can you please do the following:

• [ ] Update the title in the paper.md file
• [ ] Call @editorialbot generate pdf in a comment here.

I think it should probably be Real-time rather than Real-Time.

Thanks

[aceglia]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[aceglia]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[aceglia]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[aceglia]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Done. Thanks!

[danasolav]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Sorry, I'm too busy to take another one at the moment.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman is now the editor

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@alcantarar @romainmartinez @felixchenier @trallard @abhishektha @melund @modenaxe @BKillen05 @finsberg @bzenger would you be interested in reviewing this submission Biosiglive: an Open Source Python Package for Real-time Biosignal Processing for JOSS (the Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS reviews focus on the evaluation of the software and the review of a short paper.

This is a pre-review issue where reviewers are assigned. Once we have sufficient reviewers we will open a review issue, so the review will take place on GitHub. Here is an example of a complete review if you are curious as to what the process is like: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4859 As you can see, a checklist guides each reviewer through the process.

Let me know if you can help or if you have any more questions. Note we can be quite flexible regarding the time needed to complete the review. Thanks!

[felixchenier]

Good morning @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Thanks for contacting me. I'm currently on a sabbatical leave, and I do not use Vicon Nexus or Delsys Trigno in my lab, so I couldn't do this review unfortunately. Regards, Félix.

[melund]

Thanks for inviting me to review this @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman. I read the article proof, but the topic a little outside my current interest, and simply too busy at the moment. So I will have to pass on this. Sorry.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@alcantarar @romainmartinez @trallard @abhishektha @modenaxe @BKillen05 @marcoghislieri @bzenger would you be interested in reviewing this submission Biosiglive: an Open Source Python Package for Real-time Biosignal Processing for JOSS (the Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS reviews focus on the evaluation of the software and the review of a short paper.

This is a pre-review issue where reviewers are assigned. Once we have sufficient reviewers we will open a review issue, so the review will take place on GitHub. Here is an example of a complete review if you are curious as to what the process is like: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4859 As you can see, a checklist guides each reviewer through the process.

Let me know if you can help or if you have any more questions. Note we can be quite flexible regarding the time needed to complete the review. Thanks!

[finsberg]

I will be happy to review this.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot add @finsberg as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@finsberg added to the reviewers list!

[marcoghislieri]

Dear @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, Thanks for inviting me to review this submission. Sure, I'm interested and available to review Biosiglive: an Open Source Python Package for Real-time Biosignal Processing All the best

[romainmartinez]

Thank you for considering me as a reviewer. Unfortunately, at this time I am unable to commit to reviewing the paper due to my current workload and personal circumstances. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause and wish the paper and its authors the best of luck in their research!

[alcantarar]

Thanks for your consideration, but I’m unavailable for reviews.

R

On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 12:56 PM Romain Martinez @.***> wrote:

Thank you for considering me as a reviewer. Unfortunately, at this time I am unable to commit to reviewing the paper due to my current workload and personal circumstances. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause and wish the paper and its authors the best of luck in their research!

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4990#issuecomment-1399330966, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJDMLEOACLP7DNVG6G4ZMKDWTREODANCNFSM6AAAAAASSVXCRY . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot add @marcoghislieri as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@marcoghislieri added to the reviewers list!

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5091.