[PRE REVIEW]: r2ogs6: An R wrapper of the OpenGeoSys 6 Multiphysics Simulator

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@joboog<!--end-author-handle-- (Johannes Boog) Repository: https://gitlab.opengeosys.org/ogs/tools/r2ogs6 Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): 40-joss-submission Version: 0.4.643 Editor: !--editor-->@jsta<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @jmp75, @waternumbers Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/08cb661c22ca8553e418acafeb9e7cb5"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/08cb661c22ca8553e418acafeb9e7cb5/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/08cb661c22ca8553e418acafeb9e7cb5/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/08cb661c22ca8553e418acafeb9e7cb5)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @joboog. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@joboog if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: https://gitlab.opengeosys.org/ogs/tools/r2ogs6/-/tree/40-joss-submission

[editorialbot]

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: https://gitlab.opengeosys.org/ogs/tools/r2ogs6/-/tree/40-joss-submission

[editorialbot]

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

[kthyng]

@editorialbot set branch as 40-joss-submission

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[kthyng]

@editorialbot set 40-joss-submission as branch

[editorialbot]

Done! branch is now 40-joss-submission

[kthyng]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[kthyng]

@editorialbot check repository

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.14 s (1232.2 files/s, 182514.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                              118           2903           2379          10071
XML                             39             12             61           6240
HTML                             3            100              6           1263
Markdown                         4            167              0            642
Rmd                              3            265            372            340
CMake                            1             21             23            295
TeX                              1             21              5            171
YAML                             2              2              9             54
Python                           1             14              5             36
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           172           3505           2860          19112
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1551

[joboog]

Thanks for starting the review thread.

Potential reviewers may be from list: nilzon123, babakmohammadi, tamnva, mikemahoney218, khaors

[kthyng]

Thanks for your submission @joboog and sorry about the delay around the holidays.

Our relevant editors are currently occupied so I need to add this to the waitlist. Thanks for your patience.

[joboog]

@kthyng Did the waitlist got any shorter?

[kthyng]

@joboog Thank you for your patience. We have two new editors coming on next week so my hope is to get your submission taken up by one of them.

[kthyng]

Hi @jsta! What do you think about editing this submission?

[kthyng]

@editorialbot invite @jsta as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @editorname is now the editor

[jsta]

@editorialbot assign @jsta as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @jsta is now the editor

[jsta]

Hi @joboog! I'm checking your submission against the scope requirements while I look for reviewers. Is there somewhere where the package vignettes are built in pdf or html? A link would be great, I think it would help immensely in checking scope. Thanks!

Edit: nevermind, I found them. stay tuned.

[jsta]

@NilzonAV and/or @khaors are you willing and able to review this submission?

[jsta]

@tamnva are you willing and able to review this submission?

[jsta]

@zgxn are you willing and able to review this submission?

[jsta]

:wave: @teeratornk Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[tamnva]

@tamnva are you willing and able to review this submission?

yes, I can review this work

[jsta]

Thanks so much @tamnva !

[jsta]

@editorialbot add @tamnva as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@tamnva added to the reviewers list!

[tamnva]

@editorialbot add @tamnva as reviewer

Hi @jsta and @editorialbot, I just check the JOSS Conflict of Interest Policy. I am now working in the same organization (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research) with the 3 co-authors from this work. Can I still be a reviewer?

[jsta]

This is what the policy (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html#joss-conflict-of-interest-policy) says. Is it the case that "you and a submitter are both employed by the same very large organization but in different units without any knowledge of each other"? @kthyng

[tamnva]

I checked again the co-authors detail and I think I am not eligible for being a reviewer as the second condition (.....without any knowledge of each other) is not really TRUE in my case. Sorry for not checking this carefully before. Please remove me from the reviewer list. Thank you

[jsta]

@kthyng Do you have any thoughts on the conflict of interest policy here?

[jsta]

@jmp75 are you willing and able to review this submission?

[jmp75]

@jsta yes I can do this review

[jsta]

@editorialbot add @jmp75 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@jmp75 added to the reviewers list!

[kthyng]

@jsta I'm sorry — I read through these comments when you pinged me before but apparently didn't say anything. I think if @tamnva feels like it is a conflict then we should treat it as such. If it is more of a technicality than a real conflict that impacts the ability to perform a review, then it is fine to state and waive.

[jsta]

@editorialbot remove @tamnva from reviewers

[editorialbot]

@tamnva removed from the reviewers list!

[jsta]

:wave: @waternumbers Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[jsta]

:wave: @cneyens Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[waternumbers]

Hi @jsta Happy to review.

[jsta]

Great! Thanks @waternumbers

[jsta]

@editorialbot add @waternumbers as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@waternumbers added to the reviewers list!

[jsta]

@editorialbot start review