[REVIEW]: RCzechia: Spatial Objects of the Czech Republic

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@jlacko@martinfleis<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @nickbearman, @paleolimbot Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.7665574

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/28cb98d1d05835ef1e54466c29dc46ab"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/28cb98d1d05835ef1e54466c29dc46ab/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/28cb98d1d05835ef1e54466c29dc46ab/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/28cb98d1d05835ef1e54466c29dc46ab)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@nickbearman & @paleolimbot, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @martinfleis know.

✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨

Checklists

📝 Checklist for @nickbearman

📝 Checklist for @paleolimbot

arfon commented 1 year ago

@nickbearman, @paleolimbot – many thanks for your reviews here and to @martinfleis for editing this submission! JOSS relies upon the volunteer effort of people like you and we simply wouldn't be able to do this without you ✨

@jlacko – your paper is now accepted and published in JOSS :zap::rocket::boom:

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:

If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:

Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05082/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05082)

HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05082">
  <img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05082/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>

reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05082/status.svg
   :target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05082

This is how it will look in your documentation:

We need your help!

The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:

Volunteering to review for us sometime in the future. You can add your name to the reviewer list here: https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/join
Making a small donation to support our running costs here: https://numfocus.org/donate-to-joss

jlacko commented 1 year ago

Thank you all for the review and opportunity to learn. The comments from @nickbearman and @paleolimbot made the package better, and I learned a lot in the process. You rock!

openjournals / joss-reviews