Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago
:wave: @openjournals/dsais-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article
If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/4629, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept
@wincowgerDEV β can you please merge this PR? https://github.com/code4sac/trash-ai/pull/192
@editorialbot recommend-accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.5281/zenodo.4154370 is OK
- 10.1186/s43591-022-00035-1 is OK
- 10.1029/2019EA000960 is OK
- 10.1186/s40965-018-0050-y is OK
- 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.001 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.2003.06975 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/dsais-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article
If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/4632, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept
@editorialbot accept
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
Ensure proper citation by uploading a plain text CITATION.cff file to the default branch of your repository.
If using GitHub, a Cite this repository menu will appear in the About section, containing both APA and BibTeX formats. When exported to Zotero using a browser plugin, Zotero will automatically create an entry using the information contained in the .cff file.
You can copy the contents for your CITATION.cff file here:
``` cff-version: "1.2.0" authors: - family-names: Cowger given-names: Win orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9226-3104" - family-names: Hollingsworth given-names: Steven - family-names: Fey given-names: Day - family-names: Norris given-names: Mary C - family-names: Yu given-names: Walter - family-names: Kerge given-names: Kristiina - family-names: Haamer given-names: Kris - family-names: Durante given-names: Gina - family-names: Hernandez given-names: Brianda contact: - family-names: Hollingsworth given-names: Steven doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8384126 message: If you use this software, please cite our article in the Journal of Open Source Software. preferred-citation: authors: - family-names: Cowger given-names: Win orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9226-3104" - family-names: Hollingsworth given-names: Steven - family-names: Fey given-names: Day - family-names: Norris given-names: Mary C - family-names: Yu given-names: Walter - family-names: Kerge given-names: Kristiina - family-names: Haamer given-names: Kris - family-names: Durante given-names: Gina - family-names: Hernandez given-names: Brianda date-published: 2023-09-29 doi: 10.21105/joss.05136 issn: 2475-9066 issue: 89 journal: Journal of Open Source Software publisher: name: Open Journals start: 5136 title: "Trash AI: A Web GUI for Serverless Computer Vision Analysis of Images of Trash" type: article url: "https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05136" volume: 8 title: "Trash AI: A Web GUI for Serverless Computer Vision Analysis of Images of Trash" ```
If the repository is not hosted on GitHub, a .cff file can still be uploaded to set your preferred citation. Users will be able to manually copy and paste the citation.
πππ π Toot for this paper π πππ
π¨π¨π¨ THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! π¨π¨π¨
Here's what you must now do:
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
@domna, @luxaritas β many thanks for your reviews here! JOSS relies upon the volunteer effort of people like you and we simply wouldn't be able to do this without you β¨
@wincowgerDEV β your paper is now accepted and published in JOSS :zap::rocket::boom:
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05136/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05136)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05136">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05136/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05136/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05136
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Wonderful! Thank you so much @arfon, @luxaritas, and @domna for all your hard work helping us bring this project to life.
Congrats π I was happy to review this nice project! Good luck with your software in the future. I hope the publication gives you some additional reach for your research!
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@wincowgerDEV<!--end-author-handle-- (Win Cowger) Repository: https://github.com/code4sac/trash-ai Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@arfon<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @domna, @luxaritas Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.8384126
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@domna & @luxaritas, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @arfon know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
π Checklist for @domna
π Checklist for @luxaritas