openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: LabCD: An annotation tool for remote sensing change detection #5137

Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@geoyee<!--end-author-handle-- (YiZhou Chen) Repository: https://github.com/geoyee/LabCD Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): docs Version: 0.2 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c5faf99848988fbfcf56605a234b3f18"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c5faf99848988fbfcf56605a234b3f18/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c5faf99848988fbfcf56605a234b3f18/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c5faf99848988fbfcf56605a234b3f18)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @geoyee. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@geoyee if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 1 year ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/s11263-007-0090-8 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.2210.08788 is OK
- 10.1109/ICCVW54120.2021.00180 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 1 year ago
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.03 s (1158.4 files/s, 132685.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C++                             15            181             90           2749
C/C++ Header                    15             74             11            500
XML                              2              0              0            390
Qt Linguist                      1              0              0            230
Markdown                         3             57              0            113
TeX                              1              2              0             28
Prolog                           1              1              0             18
YAML                             1              1              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            39            316            105           4046
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 341

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

kthyng commented 1 year ago

Hi @geoyee and thanks for your submission! I am pinging the editorial board to check if it is in scope for JOSS. One thing I am concerned about is the lack of packaging, and another is about whether it is research software by our definition. It would help for the latter question if you could explain why you think it is.

Your paper is also missing a section entitled "Statement of need".

kthyng commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot query scope

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Submission flagged for editorial review.

geoyee commented 1 year ago

Hi @kthyng , thanks for your reply.

geoyee commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

geoyee commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

geoyee commented 1 year ago

Hi @kthyng , may I ask if you are satisfied with my reply and modification. Thanks.

kthyng commented 1 year ago

Hi @geoyee — unfortunately the editorial board has decided that this submission is not in scope. However, I'll provide some feedback and you are welcome to resubmit at a future date, if you change the submission according to the feedback. And note that people do think it is research software and so acceptable by that measure.

Comments from the editorial board:

kthyng commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot reject

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Paper rejected.