openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
699 stars 36 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: popkinmocks: mock IFU datacubes for modelling stellar populations and kinematics #5144

Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@prashjet<!--end-author-handle-- (Prashin Jethwa) Repository: https://github.com/prashjet/popkinmocks Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@plaplant<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @apoudel2014, @Jammy2211 Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8ac74475656358c47ac2569953c09d6d"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8ac74475656358c47ac2569953c09d6d/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8ac74475656358c47ac2569953c09d6d/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8ac74475656358c47ac2569953c09d6d)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @prashjet. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@prashjet if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 1 year ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1137/22M1503002 is OK
- 10.1017/pasa.2020.8 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stac1532 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stac1531 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stz1154 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/staa1584 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stab229 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 1 year ago
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.21 s (189.1 files/s, 29146.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          17            717           1353           2365
Markdown                         9            339              0            904
YAML                             6              6             17            122
TeX                              1              7              0            107
reStructuredText                 5             58             60             56
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            40           1139           1438           3589
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 654

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

dfm commented 1 year ago

@prashjet — Thanks for your submission! As the managing editor for this "track" of JOSS submissions, I'm taking a first pass through the code and paper, and I'm working on recruiting an editor to handle your submission. I'll keep you posted on progress!

plaplant commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot assign @plaplant as editor

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Assigned! @plaplant is now the editor

plaplant commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @apoudel2014 as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

@apoudel2014 added to the reviewers list!

plaplant commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @Jammy2211 as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

@Jammy2211 added to the reviewers list!

plaplant commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5225.

apoudel2014 commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot generate my checklist

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Checklists can only be created once the review has started in the review issue