[PRE REVIEW]: spINAR: An R Package for Semiparametric and Parametric Estimation and Bootstrapping of Integer-Valued Autoregressive (INAR) Models

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@MFaymon<!--end-author-handle-- (Maxime Faymonville) Repository: https://github.com/MFaymon/spINAR Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@crsl4<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @ManuelStapper, @SaranjeetKaur Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/6fcfcc77635fdd18153b35d5986fe2aa"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/6fcfcc77635fdd18153b35d5986fe2aa/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/6fcfcc77635fdd18153b35d5986fe2aa/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/6fcfcc77635fdd18153b35d5986fe2aa)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @MFaymon. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@MFaymon if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.15 s (208.9 files/s, 16435.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               23             96            354           1206
XML                              1              0              2            441
Markdown                         3             52              0            149
TeX                              1             11              0             99
YAML                             3             17              8             80
Bourne Shell                     1              1              0              2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            32            177            364           1977
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 708

[arfon]

@MFaymon - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.1007/s10260-022-00655-0 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7488440 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v082.i05 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.3150/18-bej1057 may be a valid DOI for title: Bootstrapping INAR Models
- 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1985.tb05379.x may be a valid DOI for title: Some simple models for discrete variate time series
- 10.1214/aop/1176994950 may be a valid DOI for title: Discrete analogues of self-decomposability and stability

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[MFaymon]

@arfon I suggest Manuel Stapper (ManuelStapper) as reviewer for our paper who already agreed to the review. Additionally, I suggest Dom-Owens-UoB, mehmet-ozcan and SaranjeetKaur from the list of people who have already agreed to review for JOSS.

[arfon]

@editorialbot invite @crsl4 as editor

:wave: @crsl4 – would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[crsl4]

A little outside my area of expertise, but I am happy to serve as editor, but I believe you still need to assign a 'buddy' editor as I am just starting, is that right @arfon ?

[arfon]

Thanks @crsl4! @majensen will be your buddy here :-)

[arfon]

@editorialbot assign @crsl4 as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @crsl4 is now the editor

[crsl4]

OK, slowly getting back into it, sorry for the delay! Tagging @majensen for moral support.

@ManuelStapper @Dom-Owens-UoB @mehmet-ozcan @SaranjeetKaur Hello! Would you be interested in reviewing this paper? :)

[ManuelStapper]

Sure, I'm in!

[SaranjeetKaur]

Count me in!

[crsl4]

@editorialbot add @ManuelStapper as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@ManuelStapper added to the reviewers list!

[crsl4]

@editorialbot add @SaranjeetKaur as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@SaranjeetKaur added to the reviewers list!

[crsl4]

Thank you both!!

[crsl4]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5386.