[PRE REVIEW]: Geodata-Harvester: A Python package to jumpstart geospatial data extraction and analysis

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@sebhaan<!--end-author-handle-- (Sebastian Haan) Repository: https://github.com/Sydney-Informatics-Hub/geodata-harvester Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.2.2 Editor: !--editor-->@hugoledoux<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @lukasbeuster, @sjsrey Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/db121dc1e185f35d06c1137f7d25f79c"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/db121dc1e185f35d06c1137f7d25f79c/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/db121dc1e185f35d06c1137f7d25f79c/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/db121dc1e185f35d06c1137f7d25f79c)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @sebhaan. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@sebhaan if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.19 s (464.8 files/s, 142187.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                            18           1388              0          13795
Python                          27           1085           2169           3940
Markdown                        29            902              0           2685
JavaScript                       1             35              6            300
YAML                            10             29             33            249
TeX                              1              5              0             58
Jupyter Notebook                 2              0            808             30
SVG                              1              0              0             16
CSS                              1              0              1              0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            90           3444           3017          21073
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 900

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.21105/joss.03168 is OK
- 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W1-2022-301-2022 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02305 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031 may be a valid DOI for title: Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone
- 10.1016/s1364-8152(01)00008-1 may be a valid DOI for title: Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[kthyng]

Hi @sebhaan and thanks for your submission! Could you take a look at the missing DOIs above and see if they apply? They aren't always correct but should be checked.

Also please take a look at the list of volunteer reviewers to suggest some relevant potential reviewers: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers. It's also fine to suggest from your extended network, as long as you aren't conflicted. Please list github handles without "@" so they aren't preemptively pinged.

[kthyng]

@hugoledoux Are you up for editing this submission?

[kthyng]

@editorialbot invite @hugoledoux as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot assign @hugoledoux as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @hugoledoux is now the editor

[sebhaan]

Hi @sebhaan and thanks for your submission! Could you take a look at the missing DOIs above and see if they apply? They aren't always correct but should be checked.

Also please take a look at the list of volunteer reviewers to suggest some relevant potential reviewers: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers. It's also fine to suggest from your extended network, as long as you aren't conflicted. Please list github handles without "@" so they aren't preemptively pinged.

Thanks, I have checked the missing DOIs and added to paper.bib.

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot add @lukasbeuster as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@lukasbeuster added to the reviewers list!

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot add @sjsrey as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@sjsrey added to the reviewers list!

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5205.