Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.14 s (468.6 files/s, 101607.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML 11 357 30 3326
SVG 1 0 0 2671
Python 15 448 674 921
JavaScript 11 144 219 872
CSS 5 200 37 834
reStructuredText 10 169 175 274
Jupyter Notebook 4 0 1996 271
Cython 1 85 93 142
TeX 1 15 0 105
Markdown 3 35 0 85
TOML 1 10 0 63
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
YAML 1 1 0 5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 66 1476 3232 9604
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 1045
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1007/978-3-030-74251-5_26 may be a valid DOI for title: SINr: Fast Computing of Sparse Interpretable Node Representations is not a Sin!
- 10.3115/v1/d14-1162 may be a valid DOI for title: Glove: Global vectors for word representation
- 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.645 may be a valid DOI for title: CamemBERT: a tasty French language model
- 10.1145/2939672.2939751 may be a valid DOI for title: Asymmetric transitivity preserving graph embedding
- 10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11935 may be a valid DOI for title: Spine: Sparse interpretable neural embeddings
- 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008 may be a valid DOI for title: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
INVALID DOIs
- None
mbod, alexanderfurnas, cmaimone, timClicks, caimeng2, linuxscout, yangli-stat, ajgates42, onurvarol, ati-ozgur, yangcatiu, jkbrenc
Hello @nicolasdugue, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
:page_facing_up: Preprint file created: Find it here in the Artifacts list :page_facing_up:
@editorialbot query scope
@nicolasdugue – due to the relatively small size of this code, the editors will now discuss if it meets the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. We should get back to you sometime next week.
Submission flagged for editorial review.
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1007/978-3-030-74251-5_26 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1301.3781 is OK
- 10.3115/v1/D14-1162 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1912.05372 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1911.03894 is OK
- 10.1145/2939672.2939754 is OK
- 10.1145/2939672.2939751 is OK
- 10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10179 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1711.08792 is OK
- 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008 is OK
- 10.1145/3340531.3412757 is OK
- 10.18653/v1/N19-4010 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@nicolasdugue – thanks for your submission to JOSS. Unfortunately, after review by the JOSS editorial team we've determined that this submission doesn't meet our substantial scholarly effort criterion.
One possible alternative to JOSS is to follow GitHub's guide on how to create a permanent archive and DOI for your software. This DOI can then be used by others to cite your work.
@editorialbot reject
Paper rejected.
@editorialbot commands
Hello @nicolasdugue, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
@editorialbot check repository
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.07 s (1194.4 files/s, 233356.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML 11 357 30 3328
SVG 1 0 0 2671
Python 23 783 1042 1622
JavaScript 11 144 219 872
CSS 5 200 37 834
reStructuredText 13 251 282 379
Markdown 8 79 0 208
Jupyter Notebook 3 0 2187 146
Cython 1 85 93 142
YAML 4 21 13 117
TeX 1 15 0 116
TOML 1 13 0 70
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 84 1960 3911 10540
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
59 Thibault Prouteau
35 nicolasdugue
20 Thibault PROUTEAU
3 Guillot Simon
3 Nico
1 Simon Guillot
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1045
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
🟡 License found: Other
(Check here for OSI approval)
License info:
🟡 License found:
Other
(Check here for OSI approval)
@editorialbot check repository
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.07 s (1201.8 files/s, 244810.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML 11 357 30 3328
SVG 1 0 0 2671
Python 23 795 1054 1647
JavaScript 11 144 219 872
CSS 5 200 37 834
reStructuredText 13 251 282 379
Markdown 8 79 0 208
Jupyter Notebook 4 0 3012 176
Cython 1 85 93 142
YAML 4 21 13 117
TeX 1 15 0 116
TOML 1 13 0 70
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 85 1972 4748 10595
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
59 Thibault Prouteau
35 nicolasdugue
20 Thibault PROUTEAU
4 Nico
3 Guillot Simon
1 Simon Guillot
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1045
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
🟡 License found: Other
(Check here for OSI approval)
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@nicolasdugue<!--end-author-handle-- (Nicolas Dugué) Repository: https://github.com/SINr-Embeddings/sinr Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: 1.1.1 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @nicolasdugue. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@nicolasdugue if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: