[PRE REVIEW]: A Python package for homogenization procedures in fiber reinforced polymers

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@Extraweich<!--end-author-handle-- (Nicolas Christ) Repository: https://github.com/Extraweich/homopy Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.10 Editor: !--editor-->@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @likask, @nicoguaro, @lizarett Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3ff6841e9a89fc91a0578df9ca677179"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3ff6841e9a89fc91a0578df9ca677179/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3ff6841e9a89fc91a0578df9ca677179/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3ff6841e9a89fc91a0578df9ca677179)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Extraweich. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@Extraweich if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.20 s (380.8 files/s, 229841.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG                              8              3             51          22133
JavaScript                      14           2420           2485           9106
HTML                            16            543             48           4103
Python                          10            291            619            879
Jupyter Notebook                 5              0           1795            788
CSS                              5            187             39            759
TeX                              1             22              0            270
Markdown                         5             70              0            216
YAML                             2              7              4             42
reStructuredText                10             35             66             40
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            78           3590           5115          38371
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 889

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.mechmat.2022.104307 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.04389 is OK
- 10.1115/1.3153710 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-28983-6 is OK
- 10.1122/1.549945 is OK
- 10.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-3 is OK
- 10.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 is OK
- 10.1088/978-0-7503-1454-1ch26 is OK
- 10.1016/0167-6636(87)90005-6 is OK
- 10.5445/KSP/1000070061 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-662-46737-4 is OK
- 10.1002/pc.750050413 is OK
- 10.1007/978-94-009-3489-4 is OK
- 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00129-2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104555 is OK
- 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00117-6 is OK
- 10.1016/0010-4361(78)90341-5 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.027 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6461940 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4029448 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.21236/ad0692481 may be a valid DOI for title: Effects of Environmental Factors on Composite Materials

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[Extraweich]

Potential reviewer seem to be timokoch, shravantata, sthavishtha and mbagheri20, to name a few.

[Extraweich]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @Extraweich, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[Extraweich]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.mechmat.2022.104307 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.04389 is OK
- 10.1115/1.3153710 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-28983-6 is OK
- 10.1122/1.549945 is OK
- 10.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-3 is OK
- 10.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 is OK
- 10.21236/ad0692481 is OK
- 10.1088/978-0-7503-1454-1ch26 is OK
- 10.1016/0167-6636(87)90005-6 is OK
- 10.5445/KSP/1000070061 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-662-46737-4 is OK
- 10.1002/pc.750050413 is OK
- 10.1007/978-94-009-3489-4 is OK
- 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00129-2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104555 is OK
- 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00117-6 is OK
- 10.1016/0010-4361(78)90341-5 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.027 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6461940 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4029448 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[Extraweich]

@editorialbot check repository

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.22 s (348.8 files/s, 210427.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG                              8              3             51          22133
JavaScript                      14           2420           2485           9106
HTML                            16            544             48           4087
Python                          10            291            617            879
Jupyter Notebook                 5              0           1795            788
CSS                              5            187             39            759
TeX                              1             22              0            271
Markdown                         5             70              0            216
YAML                             2              7              4             42
reStructuredText                10             35             66             40
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            78           3591           5113          38356
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 889

[Extraweich]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[Extraweich]

I think a better label would be "Track: 3 PE", since it is really more of an engineering / material science / material physics software.

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @Extraweich, we made that track move, and @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman has volunteered to edit your submission. We'll use this issue to also find reviewers—any suggestions you have would be welcome.

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot invite @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman is now the editor

[Extraweich]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

Thanks a lot for your volunteering!

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@JulianKarlBauer you are a code contributor for this work but not listed as an author. @Extraweich it may be okay to exclude certain contributors as authors, but I am just raising this here in case this is by mistake or in case the contributor in questions feels co-authorship would be appropriate. Can you confirm the author set of the paper is accurate/complete? Note, if you like, you may also consider acknowledging contributors in the paper's acknowledgement section.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@nicoguaro, @likask, @lizarett, @nickelnine37, @frederickgosselin, @PolymerGuy, @fmatuschke would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS? It concerns a "Python package for homogenization procedures in fiber reinforced polymers".

Paper Software

[likask]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Happy to do this.

[frederickgosselin]

Hi Kevin, Thanks for the invitation. This is a bit besides my area of expertise. Perhaps my colleague Martin Levesque at Polytechnique Montréal or his former PhD student Elias Ghossein who now work at Maya HTT could be available. This is dead on their specialty.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot add @likask as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@likask added to the reviewers list!

[nicoguaro]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, I can help with this.

[lizarett]

hello, this is a bit aside from my knowledge, but i can look. please, add me @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman

[nickelnine37]

Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, this looks interesting but it's also a little far outside of my area of expertise, so I will have to decline. Best wishes. Ed

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot add @nicoguaro as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@nicoguaro added to the reviewers list!

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@lizarett I'll add you an an $(n+1)^{th}$ reviewer, since you expressed an interest.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot add @lizarett as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@lizarett added to the reviewers list!

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5295.

[JulianKarlBauer]

@JulianKarlBauer you are a code contributor for this work but not listed as an author. @Extraweich it may be okay to exclude certain contributors as authors, but I am just raising this here in case this is by mistake or in case the contributor in questions feels co-authorship would be appropriate. Can you confirm the author set of the paper is accurate/complete? Note, if you like, you may also consider acknowledging contributors in the paper's acknowledgement section.

Thank you @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman for raising this question. @Extraweich kindly contacted me beforehand and again after your remark. I only did a little bit of code clean-up and took the opportunity to compare some minor features which homopy shares with mechkit and mechmean. These comparisons actually made their way to the tests, which I am very happy about. However, I did not contribute to the actual new content within homopy nor the paper itself. Therefore, I think that co-authorship is not appropriate. Thank you again for raising the question :) And thanks @Extraweich for making this great contribution and giving the opportunity for comparisons, this is very valuable.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@JulianKarlBauer okay, thanks for getting back to us with this information.