Closed editorialbot closed 7 months ago
@editorialbot recommend-accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/sbcs-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article
If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/4984, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept
@editorialbot recommend-accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/sbcs-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article
If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/5003, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept
@takayabe0505 can you fix the double parentheses for the citations please? So make it for example:
(e.g., De Montjoye et al., 2016 or Pappalardo et al., 2019)
Otherwise, it's looking good. Just tag me when you're done. :)
@oliviaguest we substituted the parentheses with an em dash (as the inner parenthesis is due to the citation style).
Let us know if you need any other edit.
@editorialbot recommend-accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/sbcs-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article
If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/5045, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept
@ubi15 no, sorry, this still isn't right. Please change to not use parentheses. I think you haven't seen the command yet, I'll tag it in a PR for you, no problem. π
Take a look at this and feel free to merge or make your own edits as needed: https://github.com/mindearth/mobilkit/pull/18
Thanks a lot @oliviaguest , I completely missed the square brackets. We merged your suggestions, many many thanks for your help on this!
@editorialbot recommend-accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/sbcs-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article
If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/5081, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept
@editorialbot accept
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
Ensure proper citation by uploading a plain text CITATION.cff file to the default branch of your repository.
If using GitHub, a Cite this repository menu will appear in the About section, containing both APA and BibTeX formats. When exported to Zotero using a browser plugin, Zotero will automatically create an entry using the information contained in the .cff file.
You can copy the contents for your CITATION.cff file here:
``` cff-version: "1.2.0" authors: - family-names: Ubaldi given-names: Enrico orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1685-9939" - family-names: Yabe given-names: Takahiro orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8967-1967" - family-names: Jones given-names: Nicholas - family-names: Khan given-names: Maham Faisal - family-names: Feliciotti given-names: Alessandra orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1471-5360" - family-names: Clemente given-names: Riccardo Di orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8005-6351" - family-names: Ukkusuri given-names: Satish V. - family-names: Strano given-names: Emanuele orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2339-6824" contact: - family-names: Yabe given-names: Takahiro orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8967-1967" doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24707115 message: If you use this software, please cite our article in the Journal of Open Source Software. preferred-citation: authors: - family-names: Ubaldi given-names: Enrico orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1685-9939" - family-names: Yabe given-names: Takahiro orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8967-1967" - family-names: Jones given-names: Nicholas - family-names: Khan given-names: Maham Faisal - family-names: Feliciotti given-names: Alessandra orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1471-5360" - family-names: Clemente given-names: Riccardo Di orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8005-6351" - family-names: Ukkusuri given-names: Satish V. - family-names: Strano given-names: Emanuele orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2339-6824" date-published: 2024-03-01 doi: 10.21105/joss.05201 issn: 2475-9066 issue: 95 journal: Journal of Open Source Software publisher: name: Open Journals start: 5201 title: "Mobilkit: A Python Toolkit for Urban Resilience and Disaster Risk Management Analytics" type: article url: "https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05201" volume: 9 title: "Mobilkit: A Python Toolkit for Urban Resilience and Disaster Risk Management Analytics" ```
If the repository is not hosted on GitHub, a .cff file can still be uploaded to set your preferred citation. Users will be able to manually copy and paste the citation.
πππ π Toot for this paper π πππ
π¨π¨π¨ THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! π¨π¨π¨
Here's what you must now do:
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
@arfon do you know why the version of the paper that editorialbot published is not the latest?
Huge thanks to the editor: @crvernon reviewers: @ifthompson, @levisweetbreu! β¨ JOSS appreciates your work and effort. β¨ Also, big congratulations to the author @takayabe0505! π₯³ πΎ
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05201/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05201)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05201">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05201/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05201/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05201
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@takayabe0505<!--end-author-handle-- (Takahiro Yabe) Repository: https://github.com/mindearth/mobilkit Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.2.8 Editor: !--editor-->@crvernon<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @ifthompson, @levisweetbreu Archive: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24707115
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@ssujit & @jlevente, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @crvernon know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
π Checklist for @levisweetbreu
π Checklist for @ifthompson