Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=1.34 s (1151.4 files/s, 205428.7 lines/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C++ 454 15781 21871 58015
C/C++ Header 545 14892 31207 49320
SVG 43 40 48 38349
CMake 191 1963 6426 8358
TeX 41 1049 383 8025
Python 68 1592 934 5047
GLSL 111 565 301 2753
reStructuredText 18 1380 1888 2566
YAML 15 69 53 762
Markdown 4 106 0 382
C 3 103 62 340
Bourne Shell 32 69 8 267
Dockerfile 7 68 25 221
XSLT 1 7 6 120
Lisp 1 11 2 87
PHP 3 18 9 82
Bourne Again Shell 1 25 12 44
make 3 11 33 31
JSON 4 0 0 29
TOML 1 0 0 11
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 1546 37749 63268 174809
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 995
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1002/nme.5339 is OK
- 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.01.003 is OK
- 10.1016/j.finel.2015.02.003 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.4837 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106459 is OK
- 10.1617/s11527-018-1236-6 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.02.014 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106744 is OK
- 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115427 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106744 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106974 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.10.010 is OK
- 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.026 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.03.014 is OK
- 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.09.015 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.08.014 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.6816 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.020 is OK
- 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122244 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.043002 is OK
- 10.1016/j.mechmat.2014.03.009 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.1517545113 is OK
- 10.1007/s11249-012-9920-0 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.4898 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jmps.2015.12.014 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.01.008 is OK
- 10.1007/s10704-017-0239-6 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jmps.2013.10.007 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.6705 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104607 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.06.040 may be a valid DOI for title: A mechanistic model for the growth of cylindrical debris particles in the presence of adhesion
- 10.1016/j.cma.2019.04.006 may be a valid DOI for title: A Fourier-accelerated volume integral method for elastoplastic contact
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Hello @nrichart, thanks for your submission to JOSS. We will use this pre-review issue to assign an editor to handle your submission and find reviewers. Any reviewer suggestions you can make would be welcome.
Unfortunately, we do not have any editors in this area currently available, so I have to put your submission on our waitlist. I will get it assigned as soon as someone frees up, hopefully soon.
@kyleniemeyer I just finished one paper yesterday and could take it.
Hello @kyleniemeyer, I can suggest different names of people working on FEM codes:
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1002/nme.5339 is OK
- 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.01.003 is OK
- 10.1016/j.finel.2015.02.003 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.4837 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106459 is OK
- 10.1617/s11527-018-1236-6 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.02.014 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106744 is OK
- 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115427 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106744 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106974 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.10.010 is OK
- 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.026 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.03.014 is OK
- 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.09.015 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.08.014 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.6816 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.020 is OK
- 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122244 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.043002 is OK
- 10.1016/j.mechmat.2014.03.009 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.1517545113 is OK
- 10.1007/s11249-012-9920-0 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.4898 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jmps.2015.12.014 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.01.008 is OK
- 10.1007/s10704-017-0239-6 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jmps.2013.10.007 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.06.040 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cma.2019.04.006 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.6705 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104607 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot assign @diehlpk as editor
Thanks @diehlpk!
Assigned! @diehlpk is now the editor
Why is @editorialbot adding the label C
and not C++
? and also the label PHP
seams random. It is not really important, but it makes me curious.
Why is @editorialbot adding the label
C
and notC++
? and also the labelPHP
seams random. It is not really important, but it makes me curious.
@openjournals/dev can you please respond here?
Hi @bhajay do you time to review this paper?
Hi @chennachaos do you have time to review this paper? I think you would be a good fit, especially for the HPC part.
Hi @vijaysm do you have time to review this paper?
Yes I have time in the next month now. So should be able to quickly perform the review. @diehlpk
@editorialbot add @vijaysm as reviewer
@vijaysm added to the reviewers list!
Hi @diehlpk, sure! Happy to review. But it will take about 2-3 months to complete the review. If that's okay, add me as a reviewer.
@editorialbot @chennachaos as reviewer
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot add @chennachaos as reviewer
@chennachaos added to the reviewers list!
Hi @diehlpk, sure! Happy to review. But it will take about 2-3 months to complete the review. If that's okay, add me as a reviewer.
Thanks. The proposed time frame sounds good to me.
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5253.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@nrichart<!--end-author-handle-- (Nicolas Richart) Repository: https://gitlab.com/akantu/akantu Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): features/joss-2023 Version: v4.0.1 Editor: !--editor-->@diehlpk<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @vijaysm, @chennachaos Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @nrichart. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@nrichart if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: