Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1093/nar/gky379 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2018.00261 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2012.00007 is OK
- 10.1038/nrn3475 is OK
- 10.1111/nyas.13325 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.10.013 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2011.00013 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth361 is OK
- 10.1155/2011/156869 is OK
- 10.1126/science.aac4716 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.046 is OK
- 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00185-X is OK
- 10.1177/0956797611417632 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000797 is OK
- 10.1017/S0140525X17001972 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1007/3-211-27183-x_1 may be a valid DOI for title: MATLAB
INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=42.93 s (169.8 files/s, 28198.5 lines/s)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MATLAB 5647 95785 230136 480408
C 829 33375 46894 162300
C++ 109 6363 6643 25657
C/C++ Header 283 8799 18127 22648
make 115 2891 1412 9397
TeX 19 1676 623 9097
Fortran 77 36 1743 3894 7722
Java 39 1069 1661 5194
HTML 40 598 1060 5020
Bourne Shell 20 961 1044 2710
Windows Module Definition 8 122 0 2437
Arduino Sketch 7 536 904 2303
Markdown 27 499 0 1150
XML 14 18 43 1005
TypeScript 1 0 0 1001
C Shell 29 148 127 784
Expect 6 17 0 783
Ruby 4 0 0 603
Python 4 173 94 532
MSBuild script 2 0 0 455
Mathematica 3 9 0 220
Perl 1 40 81 220
XSLT 1 47 21 217
sed 5 8 0 164
ProGuard 7 50 25 141
CMake 3 58 16 107
Ant 2 16 2 100
Scheme 1 0 0 78
CSS 1 14 2 66
INI 9 6 5 59
Bourne Again Shell 3 8 0 40
DOS Batch 3 11 1 39
reStructuredText 1 18 0 33
awk 6 15 0 29
Qt Project 2 6 0 18
MUMPS 1 4 0 14
YAML 2 0 0 11
Solidity 2 0 0 10
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 7292 155083 312815 742772
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 1579
@editorialbot invite @chartgerink as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@chartgerink do you think you can help edit this work? I thought that the "reproducible science" aspect might connect with you. Note, there are a number of EMG/ECG/EEG/signal processing papers in JOSS already, and you might check if reviewers for those are applicable to this submission too.
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman sorry I'd prefer not to - I'm swamped with other tasks and I do not feel up to the task to edit a MATLAB based piece.
@crsl4 do you think this submission is something you could help edit?
@editorialbot invite @crsl4 as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
:wave: @crsl4 do you think you can help with this one?
Sorry, just back from break and catching up with piles of emails. Yes, I can edit it, but I might be slow as is one of my first papers to serve as editor.
@editorialbot assign @crsl4 as editor
Assigned! @crsl4 is now the editor
That is great @crsl4! Take your time. And I am here to help if you have any questions.
Of the list of potential reviewers: @sealhuang @nicoguaro @nirum Hello! Would you be interested in reviewing this paper? :)
Of the list of potential reviewers: @sealhuang @nicoguaro @nirum Hello! Would you be interested in reviewing this paper? :)
Currently in reviewing an article and I think that I would have to decline this invitation.
I'm also unavailable at the moment!
Are there any updates on this @crsl4 ?
Oops! Sorry! Dropped the ball while wrapping up the semester. I will invite more people.
@stevokeyo Hello! Would you be interested in reviewing this paper? :)
@eteq Hello! Would you be interested in reviewing this paper? :)
@gflofst Hello! Would you be interested in reviewing this paper? :)
Yes! I cannot get it to before June 1 week though. Is that ok?
no problem at all! Thank you Jay!
@editorialbot add @gflofst as reviewer
@gflofst added to the reviewers list!
@daissi Hello! Would you be interested in reviewing this paper? :)
@benmarwick Hello! Would you be interested in reviewing this paper? :)
I had forgotten about this. I'll get it done hopefully on Friday. It is a light day so I should have time.
@crsl4 thank you for the invitation! Unfortunately I'm not at all familiar with Matlab, so I'm not capable of reviewing this, sorry about that.
Thanks Jay! I had not even started the "review process" because I need one more reviewer. But feel free to get started!
Ben, no worries! Thanks for responding!
@ashahide Hello! Would you be interested in reviewing this paper? :)
@LyceanEM Hello! Would you be interested in reviewing this paper? :)
Definitely - I'll take a look this weekend.
Thank you, Andy! Much appreciated:)
@editorialbot add @ashahide as reviewer
@ashahide added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5566.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@matsvanes<!--end-author-handle-- (Mats W.J. van Es) Repository: https://github.com/fieldtrip/fieldtrip Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): JOSS Version: https://github.com/fieldtrip/fieldtrip/commit/9cfc0a7e7b7871a1d9938552ce60041c59f3a553 Editor: !--editor-->@crsl4<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @gflofst, @ashahide Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @matsvanes. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@matsvanes if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: