[PRE REVIEW]: sptotal: an R package for predicting totals and weighted sums from spatial data

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@highamm<!--end-author-handle-- (Matt Higham) Repository: https://github.com/highamm/sptotal Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 1.0.1 Editor: !--editor-->@fabian-s<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @Athene-ai, @garret-rc, @garretrc Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/30a8945e4138d482c484e4f9b7ce2b7a"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/30a8945e4138d482c484e4f9b7ce2b7a/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/30a8945e4138d482c484e4f9b7ce2b7a/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/30a8945e4138d482c484e4f9b7ce2b7a)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @highamm. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@highamm if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.07 s (1336.4 files/s, 182057.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                            46           1450            180           6282
R                               29            417           1118           1194
XML                              3              0              2            606
CSS                              3             98             52            442
JavaScript                       4             64             34            266
Markdown                         4            103              0            214
Rmd                              2            176            325            166
YAML                             6             27             12            139
TeX                              1             10              0             98
SVG                              1              0              1             11
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            99           2345           1724           9418
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1242

[editorialbot]

Failed to discover a valid open source license

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1371/journal.pone.0282524 may be a valid DOI for title: spmodel: Spatial statistical modeling and prediction in R
- 10.32614/rj-2018-009 may be a valid DOI for title: Simple features for R: standardized support for spatial vector data.
- 10.1080/11956860.2002.11682701 may be a valid DOI for title: Sampling and geostatistics for spatial data
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0059129 may be a valid DOI for title: A comparison of the spatial linear model to nearest neighbor (k-NN) methods for forestry applications
- 10.1037/e471672008-001 may be a valid DOI for title: Discriminatory analysis: nonparametric discrimination, consistency properties
- 10.1007/s10651-007-0035-y may be a valid DOI for title: Spatial methods for plot-based sampling of wildlife populations
- 10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.012 may be a valid DOI for title: Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package

INVALID DOIs

- None

[kthyng]

Hi @highamm and thanks for your submission! It is relatively small – close to our scope query level of 1000 LOC – so I'm going to ping the editorial board to take a look. This will take 1-2 weeks. Thanks for your patience.

[kthyng]

@editorialbot query scope

[editorialbot]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[highamm]

Hello @kthyng and thank you for the update! If there is any clarifying information that you need from me, just let me know. Have a good day!

[kthyng]

Hi again @highamm! We have finished the scope review and are good to move forward. I'll see about finding an editor now.

[kthyng]

Hi @fabian-s! Would you be able to edit this submission?

[kthyng]

@editorialbot invite @fabian-s as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[fabian-s]

sure!

[fabian-s]

@editorialbot add fabian-s as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! fabian-s is now the editor

[fabian-s]

Hi @highamm, i'll guide this paper through the review process. While I try to rustle up some reviewers, you could already start adding the missing DOIs the bot complains about :wink:

[fabian-s]

:wave: @trashbirdecology & @garretrc

Would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[fabian-s]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[highamm]

Thank you @kthyng and @fabian-s for your help with getting this started.

@fabian-s I have added the missing doi's and I will get started working improving the testing coverage and replacing the 1:n_iter iterators mentioned in highamm/sptotal#7

Thank you both again for your time!

[trashbirdecology]

Apologies but I have zero bandwidth to the review paper nor the software right now.

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 1:20 PM Matt Higham @.***> wrote:

Thank you @kthyng https://github.com/kthyng and @fabian-s https://github.com/fabian-s for your help with getting this started.

@fabian-s https://github.com/fabian-s I have added the missing doi's and I will get started working improving the testing coverage and replacing the 1:n_iter iterators mentioned in highamm/sptotal#7 https://github.com/highamm/sptotal/issues/7

Thank you both again for your time!

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5283#issuecomment-1503804061, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACL2TNLM73K6QBGVX7NJSB3XAWHF7ANCNFSM6AAAAAAWBJLVGI . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[fabian-s]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1371/journal.pone.0282524 is OK
- 10.32614/rj-2018-009 is OK
- 10.1080/11956860.2002.11682701 is OK
- 10.1111/2041-210X.13919 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0059129 is OK
- 10.1037/e471672008-001 is OK
- 10.1007/s10651-007-0035-y is OK
- 10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.012 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[fabian-s]

:wave: @potterzot @Athene-ai @garretrc

Would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[Athene-ai]

Hi!

Yes. I am interested

https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail Privo di virus.www.avast.com https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 at 11:00, Fabian Scheipl @.***> wrote:

wave @potterzot https://github.com/potterzot @Athene-ai https://github.com/Athene-ai @garretrc https://github.com/garretrc

Would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5283#issuecomment-1504914440, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANGYEVGVNAUWKV33ZA7WXSLXAZVLNANCNFSM6AAAAAAWBJLVGI . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[fabian-s]

@editorialbot add @Athene-ai as reviewer

ty Daniela!

[editorialbot]

Can't add reviewers: There is no editor assigned yet

[fabian-s]

@editorialbot add fabian-s as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! fabian-s is now the editor

[fabian-s]

@editorialbot add @Athene-ai as reviewer

[editorialbot]

Can't add reviewers: There is no editor assigned yet

[fabian-s]

@kthyng the bot seems confused... wat do?

EDIT: could you try adding me as editor and Athene-ai as reviewer?

[kthyng]

@editorialbot add @Athene-ai as reviewer

[editorialbot]

Can't add reviewers: There is no editor assigned yet

[kthyng]

@editorialbot add fabian-s as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! fabian-s is now the editor

[kthyng]

@editorialbot add @Athene-ai as reviewer

[editorialbot]

Can't add reviewers: There is no editor assigned yet

[kthyng]

@openjournals/dev Could you take a look at this? We seem to be caught in a loop where we can't properly assign anyone.

[garretrc]

I can review!

[fabian-s]

thx @garretrc

[fabian-s]

@kthyng we could try starting the review issue, maybe adding reviewers will work in a new issue....?

[xuanxu]

I've found the problem, editorialbot does not recognize fabian-s as a GitHub user (is currently listed in the issue body missing the @) Running @editorialbot add @fabian-s as editor should fix it.

[fabian-s]

@editorialbot add @fabian-s as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @fabian-s is now the editor

[fabian-s]

@editorialbot add @Athene-ai as reviewer

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[fabian-s]

@editorialbot add @Athene-ai as reviewer