[PRE REVIEW]: ParticlePhaseSpace: A python package for streamlined import, analysis, and export of particle phase space data

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@bwheelz36<!--end-author-handle-- (Brendan Whelan) Repository: https://github.com/bwheelz36/ParticlePhaseSpace Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: v0.5.0 Editor: !--editor-->@matthewfeickert<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @benjaminbolling, @ProfLeao Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/94f4a820f1296ec3af83273e45b61e47"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/94f4a820f1296ec3af83273e45b61e47/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/94f4a820f1296ec3af83273e45b61e47/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/94f4a820f1296ec3af83273e45b61e47)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @bwheelz36. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@bwheelz36 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.04 s (934.3 files/s, 87953.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          13            240            390           1184
Jupyter Notebook                 3              0            800            136
TeX                              1             11              0            134
YAML                             4             16             10            107
Markdown                         5             37              0            101
DOS Batch                        1             11              1             32
reStructuredText                 3             15             19             21
make                             1              5              9             10
JSON                             3              0              0              3
TOML                             1              0              0              3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            35            335           1229           1731
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 735

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1088/1361-6587/ac2e3e is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-319-18317-6_8 is OK
- 10.1118/1.3397455 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1002/mp.15887 may be a valid DOI for title: Bayesian optimization to design a novel x-ray shaping device

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot invite @matthewfeickert as editor

Hi @matthewfeickert, can you take this one on?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[matthewfeickert]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @matthewfeickert is now the editor

[matthewfeickert]

:wave: @benjaminbolling As you're a JOSS reviewer with expertise in Physics and Engineering, accelerator physics, and Python would you be available and willing to help review this submission? Please let me know if you have any questions.

[matthewfeickert]

:wave: @ProfLeao As you're a JOSS reviewer with expertise in Physics and Engineering, medical physics, and Python would you be available and willing to help review this submission? Please let me know if you have any questions.

[matthewfeickert]

:wave: @bwheelz36 I'll be serving as the editor for your review. I'm going to begin the process of finding reviewers, so please be patient while I work on this, though feel free to ask me any questions that you have. :+1: As @editorialbot already mentioned at the top of the Issue, we welcome any suggestions for potential reviewers, though please mention them without tagging them with an @.

[bwheelz36]

thanks! I'll have a think about that. I assume you want people I have never published with before?

[matthewfeickert]

I assume you want people I have never published with before?

@bwheelz36 Depends on how recently you've published with them, as per the JOSS Conflict of Interest Policy. But if they don't have any conflict of interest as described there (or that they feel themselves) former co-authors are welcome to review your submission.

[benjaminbolling]

Hello! Yes, I could have a go as a reviewer for this.

[bwheelz36]

• saw a cool talk the other day from Andreas Moll who managed computing infrastructure at the australian synchrtron. I think he would have a good mix of python/ accelerator physics if he has time and we have no COI. https://github.com/portrain

struggling to think of too many people I wouldn't have at least a perceived COI right now sorry...

[matthewfeickert]

@editorialbot assign @benjaminbolling as a reviewer

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[matthewfeickert]

@editorialbot add @benjaminbolling as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@benjaminbolling added to the reviewers list!

[ProfLeao]

:wave: @ProfLeao As you're a JOSS reviewer with expertise in Physics and Engineering, medical physics, and Python would you be available and willing to help review this submission? Please let me know if you have any questions.

Ok i can

[matthewfeickert]

@editorialbot add @ProfLeao as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@ProfLeao added to the reviewers list!

[matthewfeickert]

@bwheelz36 We now have two reviewers (@benjaminbolling, @ProfLeao) so I'll start the review. :+1:

We need a minimum of two reviewers, but additional reviews are welcome and I had emailed others to ask for their review. If any of the other people I asked to review would like to just let me know and I'll add you as an additional reviewer over on the review Issue.

[matthewfeickert]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5375.