[PRE REVIEW]: PyThia: A Python package for Uncertainty Quantification based on non-intrusive polynomial chaos expansions

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@Nando-Farchmin<!--end-author-handle-- (Nando Farchmin) Repository: https://gitlab1.ptb.de/pythia/pythia Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper/joss Version: v3.1.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/35cbe106050c7c295e7d6893cf634cb6"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/35cbe106050c7c295e7d6893cf634cb6/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/35cbe106050c7c295e7d6893cf634cb6/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/35cbe106050c7c295e7d6893cf634cb6)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Nando-Farchmin. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@Nando-Farchmin if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1117/12.2552037 is OK
- 10.1117/12.2525978 is OK
- 10.1117/1.jmm.19.2.024001 is OK
- 10.5802/smai-jcm.24 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.002 is OK
- 10.3390/metrology3010001 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.13 s (304.0 files/s, 52056.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          15            836           1781           2155
Markdown                         9            232              0            652
reStructuredText                 9            245            513            182
YAML                             3             12             12             90
TeX                              1              0              0             77
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
TOML                             1              0              0              7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            40           1337           2314           3198
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 698

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[danielskatz]

@Nando-Farchmin - thanks for your submission. One concern I have before we start a review is that the software appears to be on a gitlab instance that doesn't allow people (who aren't from PTB) to create issues - see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#submission-requirements

[arfon]

:wave: @Nando-Farchmin – friendly bump on the message from @danielskatz above. As this submission currently stands (with the restrictions of your GitLab instance), this submission isn't eligible to be published in JOSS.

[danielskatz]

👋 @Nando-Farchmin - I'm just going to reject this submission at this point, but if you can address the issue above, please feel free to resubmit. Technically, the work appears fine to review other than the software repo's host.

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot reject

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.

[Nando-Hegemann]

@danielskatz @arfon Sorry for the late reply, I was on vacation and didn't expect things to go this fast. I suspected that the manual registration of PTBs Gitlab instance would be an issue, thanks anyway. I'll resubmit, if I can find a way to solve this on my side. Thanks a lot!