search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
704 stars 37 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: Scanbot: An STM Automation Bot #5432

Closed editorialbot closed 10 months ago

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@ceds92<!--end-author-handle-- (Julian Ceddia) Repository: https://github.com/New-Horizons-SPM/scanbot Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: v2.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@zhubonan<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @ziatdinovmax, @jagar2 Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/dd610b087f2f82d4488515b21dfda185"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/dd610b087f2f82d4488515b21dfda185/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/dd610b087f2f82d4488515b21dfda185/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/dd610b087f2f82d4488515b21dfda185)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ceds92. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@ceds92 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
ceds92 commented 6 months ago

Hi @ianhi, thanks so much for agreeing! Yes, the software can be tested with the freely available STM simulator. I hope I have included enough detail in the documentation such that a non-STM'r can still download and test the software. Otherwise please ask if you have any questions.

https://new-horizons-spm.github.io/scanbot/web-app-test/

Your time is very much appreciated!

zhubonan commented 6 months ago

@ianhi thanks for agreeing to review. I hope @ceds92 has addressed your concern. It is absolutely fine if you want to start the review next week.

jonatanalvelid commented 5 months ago

Hi @zhubonan, I unfortunately have no experience with STM, and very limited time currently, so I will have to pass this time. Thanks for asking, and hope I can be of help another time.

kasasxav commented 5 months ago

Hi @zhubonan, same for me I'm sorry, I don't feel I have enough knowledge to review the paper. Thank you for considering me though!

zhubonan commented 5 months ago

@ianhi Are you happy to review the package? If so, I will add you to reviewers. Please let me know. Thanks a lot 😄

ceds92 commented 4 months ago

@zhubonan I think @ianhi has already been added as a reviewer. I can see he has run the command to generate the checklist, although I can't seem to see it?

ceds92 commented 4 months ago

@zhubonan someone else who has a background in STM and seems to have experience writing code to control STMs is Koen Lauwaet (GitHub, google scholar) . Maybe they will be willing to review?

zhubonan commented 4 months ago

Hi @KoenImdea would you be able to help review this JOSS submission? It is about automating scanning tunnelling microscope and help for things like tip preparation.

We are currently short for reviewers. There is already one reviewer who have completed the review and recommanded for publication. However, we do need to have two reviews in order to accept the work. Your contribution would be really appreciated.

The manuscript can be viewed here 👉 View article proof on GitHub Software repository 👉 https://github.com/New-Horizons-SPM/scanbot The JOSS reviewer policy and reviewer guideline for your reference 👉 Reviewer Guideline

Thanks in advance.

KoenImdea commented 4 months ago

Hi @zhubonan and @ceds92 , I am willing to give that a go. I probably will need a guide for dummies about how to submit the review though. I have not had the pleasure to work with the collaboration features of GitHub so far... Cheers, Koen

zhubonan commented 4 months ago

Thanks, @KoenImdea, glad to know you will be able to review the submission!

We have documentation about how to carry out the review. It basically involves: 1. generating a checklist. 2. going through the items in the checklist. You will need to download, install and test the code. If you have any comment or problem, you can directly raise an GitHub issue in the code's repository and mention the JOSS review issue's link. You can also leave comments and ask questions in the review issue directly.

Once you are satisfied with the submission and all the boxes are ticked, just leave a comment for recommending acceptance in the review issue and ping me.