[PRE REVIEW]: PyThia: A Python package for Uncertainty Quantification based on non-intrusive polynomial chaos expansions

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@Nando-Farchmin<!--end-author-handle-- (Nando Farchmin) Repository: https://gitlab.com/pythia-uq/pythia Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper/joss Version: v3.1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@vissarion<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @timokoch Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/404cf3d30a4378baedd6058de3adb929"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/404cf3d30a4378baedd6058de3adb929/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/404cf3d30a4378baedd6058de3adb929/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/404cf3d30a4378baedd6058de3adb929)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Nando-Farchmin. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@Nando-Farchmin if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.05 s (766.2 files/s, 131541.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          15            836           1781           2155
Markdown                         9            234              0            654
reStructuredText                 9            252            517            185
YAML                             3             12             14             88
TeX                              1              0              0             77
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
TOML                             1              0              0              7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            40           1346           2320           3201
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 698

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1117/12.2552037 is OK
- 10.1117/12.2525978 is OK
- 10.1117/1.jmm.19.2.024001 is OK
- 10.5802/smai-jcm.24 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.002 is OK
- 10.3390/metrology3010001 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[danielskatz]

Thanks for this submission. I'll now look for an editor, and I'll also make some proofreading suggestions, since I see some things that will need to be fixed in the paper by the end of the process...

[danielskatz]

👋 @vissarion - would you be willing to edit this submission?

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot invite @vissarion as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[danielskatz]

[...] I'll also make some proofreading suggestions, since I see some things that will need to be fixed in the paper by the end of the process...

I've now suggested these changes in https://gitlab.com/pythia-uq/pythia/-/merge_requests/3 and https://gitlab.com/pythia-uq/pythia/-/merge_requests/4

[vissarion]

@editorialbot assign @vissarion as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @vissarion is now the editor

[Nando-Hegemann]

I merged the suggested changes from @danielskatz into the joss/paper branch.

[vissarion]

Hi, @zcstanley, @ziyiyin97, @vitorsr, @rowanc1, @lheagy, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[vissarion]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[ziyiyin97]

Yes I'm happy to.

[vissarion]

@editorialbot add @ziyiyin97 to reviewers

[editorialbot]

@ziyiyin97 added to the reviewers list!

[vissarion]

Hi @timokoch, @alizma, @gianthk, @SichengHe, @max-little would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[timokoch]

yes I can review

[vissarion]

Great, thanks @timokoch !

[vissarion]

@editorialbot add @timokoch as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@timokoch added to the reviewers list!

[vissarion]

@Nando-Hegemann the two reviewers have been found! @ziyiyin97 @timokoch thanks for volunteering!

I am starting the review now.

[vissarion]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5489.