[PRE REVIEW]: EcoAssist: A no-code platform to train and deploy custom YOLOv5 object detection models

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@PetervanLunteren<!--end-author-handle-- (Peter van Lunteren) Repository: https://github.com/PetervanLunteren/EcoAssist Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): JOSS-submission Version: v4.0 Editor: !--editor-->@mstimberg<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @animikhaich, @oparisot Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/dabe3753aae2692d9908166a7ce80e6e"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/dabe3753aae2692d9908166a7ce80e6e/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/dabe3753aae2692d9908166a7ce80e6e/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/dabe3753aae2692d9908166a7ce80e6e)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @PetervanLunteren. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@PetervanLunteren if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.04 s (383.6 files/s, 123984.5 lines/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                      files          blank        comment           code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                            1            437            509           2464
Bourne Again Shell                4            165            242            746
DOS Batch                         3             64              0            396
Markdown                          5             53              0            232
TeX                               1             10              0            132
YAML                              3              3              7             34
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             17            732            758           4004
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 580

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1002/ece3.5767 may be a valid DOI for title: Design patterns for wildlife-related camera trap image analysis
- 10.1073/pnas.1922686117 may be a valid DOI for title: Vertebrates on the brink as indicators of biological annihilation and the sixth mass extinction
- 10.1109/crv.2018.00052 may be a valid DOI for title: Deep learning object detection methods for ecological camera trap data
- 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.07.004 may be a valid DOI for title: Towards automatic wild animal monitoring: Identification of animal species in camera-trap images using very deep convolutional neural networks

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[arfon]

@PetervanLunteren - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

[PetervanLunteren]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @PetervanLunteren, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[PetervanLunteren]

@arfon Thanks for letting me know. Perhaps I can help you with finding some suitable reviewers? I had a look at the JOSS Reviewers Management System and found the following reviewers suitable:

• animikhaich
• lee-seon-woo
• mikemahoney218
• dionhaefner
• tpoisot
• abhilash12iec002
• lgloege
• patrickcgray

Let me know if I can do anything else to assist you.

[arfon]

@editorialbot assign @mstimberg as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @mstimberg is now the editor

[arfon]

Thanks for agreeing to take this submission on @mstimberg !

[mstimberg]

:wave: @dionhaefner, @smith42, @animikhaich would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[mstimberg]

@PetervanLunteren Looking forward to working with you on this submission. While we are waiting for the potential reviewers to respond, you might already have a look at the suggestions made in this comment and add DOIs in the .bib file where appropriate.

[animikhaich]

@mstimberg, Thanks for the mention. Yes, I would be happy to review the submission

[mstimberg]

@editorialbot add @animikhaich as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@animikhaich added to the reviewers list!

[PetervanLunteren]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1002/ece3.5767 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.1922686117 is OK
- 10.1109/crv.2018.00052 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.07.004 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[PetervanLunteren]

@mstimberg @animikhaich Thank you for editing and reviewing my submission. Looking forward to working with you too. I've updated the DOI's accordingly. Let me know if I can assist you otherwise.

[dionhaefner]

@mstimberg Thanks for the consideration but I don't have the bandwidth at this time.

Good luck with the review!

[mstimberg]

:wave: @oparisot, @andreped would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[oparisot]

Ok to review this submission!

[mstimberg]

Ok to review this submission!

Great, thanks a lot!

[mstimberg]

@editorialbot add @oparisot as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@oparisot added to the reviewers list!

[mstimberg]

I am going to open the new review issue now :rocket:

In case any of the invited potential reviewers wants to join us, please don't hesitate to let me know, we can still add you to the process.

[mstimberg]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5581.