Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.06 s (1039.2 files/s, 100078.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 32 646 1323 2512
Markdown 9 109 0 179
YAML 6 39 23 153
Jupyter Notebook 4 0 535 140
TeX 1 5 0 103
TOML 1 5 0 45
DOS Batch 1 8 1 27
reStructuredText 6 25 35 22
Bourne Shell 1 5 2 10
make 1 4 5 10
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 62 846 1924 3201
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1109/51.932724 is OK
- 10.1161/01.CIR.101.23.e215 is OK
- 10.13026/9njx-6322 is OK
- 10.13026/zzpx-h016 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1163/1574-9347_dnp_e612900 may be a valid DOI for title: Keras
INVALID DOIs
- None
Wordcount for paper.md
is 247
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.
👋 @devnums - your paper is not compiling. I think this is because you don't have an affiliation listed in the header in the paper.md file. Please follow the example paper and note that you can click on the error above to find out more about it.
Please feel free to make changes to your .md file, then use the command @editorialbot generate pdf
to make a new PDF. editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.
Your paper is also remarkably short. In addition to the example paper and the documentation about paper requirements, please see the other recently published papers for some examples.
👋 @bmcfee - Would you be able to edit this submission, once the paper issues are resolved, and assuming it is in scope?
@editorialbot invite @bmcfee as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
Thanks for the invite, but I'm unavailable for new assignments right now.
👋 @britta-wstnr - would you be able to edit this submission, once the paper issues are resolved, and assuming it is in scope?
@editorialbot invite @britta-wstnr as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@editorialbot commands
Hello @devnums, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@danielskatz Thank you for your suggestions. The paper has been edited and successfully compiled.
👋 @britta-wstnr - ping (re above invitation to edit)
Hi @danielskatz - sorry for my late reply, I was traveling last week. Yes, I can take this one on!
@editorialbot assign @britta-wstnr as editor
Assigned! @britta-wstnr is now the editor
Hi @devnums, I will be handling your submission. - I will start inviting reviewers, if you have any ideas for potential reviewers, you can suggest them here --- please read the guidelines in the editorialbot's first comment on how to search for reviewers and how to mention them here (don't "@" them, please).
I will be back shortly! 🙂 🌱
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1109/51.932724 is OK
- 10.1161/01.CIR.101.23.e215 is OK
- 10.13026/9njx-6322 is OK
- 10.13026/zzpx-h016 is OK
- 10.3758/s13428-020-01516-y is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
Hi @peterakirk and @cudmore :wave:
Would you be willing to review the submission: pyheartlib: A Python package for processing electrocardiogram signals for The Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)?
The review concerns the software pyheartlib and a short paper about it. The review happens fully on GitHub.
You can learn more about the the review process and our conflict of interest policy in the reviewer guidelines here.
If you are available to review this submission, please let me know and I can add you as a reviewer. The review process will start (in a separate GitHub issue) once a sufficient number of reviewers have been found.
Thank you! Britta
ping @peterakirk and @cudmore Kind reminder for my review invitation (see comment above) 🙏
Hi @britta-wstnr, my thesis is due in 2 weeks, so I unfortunately don't have the time. Happy to recommend reviewers if you want.
Thanks, Pete
Yes, I am happy to review.
Robert
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 1:11 AM Britta Westner @.***> wrote:
ping @peterakirk https://github.com/peterakirk and @cudmore https://github.com/cudmore Kind reminder for my review invitation (see comment above https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5568#issuecomment-1611629045) 🙏
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5568#issuecomment-1619755249, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHWMEGZ5WXXKBQ2KN6BWV3XOPF4RANCNFSM6AAAAAAZKLKS54 . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Hi @britta-wstnr 👋, Thank you for taking the time to handle my paper. I've found additional reviewers from the list.
Gabrock94 pzelasko
Best regards
@cudmore - amazing, thanks! 🙏 The reviewing process will start as soon as I have found a sufficient number of reviewers. I will ping you then.
@peterakirk - I understand. Good luck with finishing your thesis! 🍀
@LegrandNico has agreed vie email to review this paper as well - thanks! :pray: You will get pinged again once the reviewing process starts.
Hi @Gabrock94 👋
Would you be willing to review the submission: pyheartlib: A Python package for processing electrocardiogram signals for The Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)?
The review concerns the software pyheartlib and a short paper about it. The review happens fully on GitHub.
You can learn more about the the review process and our conflict of interest policy in the reviewer guidelines here.
If you are available to review this submission, please let me know and I can add you as a reviewer. The review process will start (in a separate GitHub issue) once a sufficient number of reviewers have been found.
Thank you! Britta
ping @Gabrock94 👋 kind reminder for my review invitation (see comment above) 🙏
ping @Gabrock94 wave kind reminder for my review invitation (see comment above) pray
HI @britta-wstnr , sorry I completely missed the first notification. I will work on it in the coming days.
Best, Giulio
Thanks @Gabrock94 - looking forward to hearing if you would be available to review this! 🙂
Ping @Gabrock94 - have you decided yet if you would be willing to review this? 🙂
Ping @Gabrock94 - have you decided yet if you would be willing to review this? 🙂
Yes I am working on it. I need likely 2 more days :)
Hi @britta-wstnr 👋
Here is another list of potential reviewers who might be interested.
pzelasko jerodway saran-nns vjbytes102 Bsingstad jwwthu neurofractal TomDonoghue
The list is not arranged in a particular order. Kindly contact them or any other reviewer that you believe would be more suitable.
Thank you for you time 🙏 Sadegh
Hi @devnums - thank you for the list (and sorry for being slow here, I had too many other things on my plate last week).
Hi @TomDonoghue and @Bsingstad 👋
Would one of you be willing to review the submission: pyheartlib: A Python package for processing electrocardiogram signals for The Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)?
The review concerns the software pyheartlib and a short paper about it. The review happens fully on GitHub.
You can learn more about the the review process and our conflict of interest policy in the reviewer guidelines here.
If you are available to review this submission, please let me know and I can add you as a reviewer. The review process will start (in a separate GitHub issue) once a sufficient number of reviewers have been found.
Thank you! Britta
Hey @britta-wstnr - thanks for the invite! Unfortunately, I have no practical experience with measuring cardiac signals to help me assess this package, and am also currently quite limited in my schedule, so I'm going to have to pass on this one!
Hi @TomDonoghue, I understand! Thank you very much for getting back to me! 🙏
Ping @Bsingstad 👋 Kind reminder for my review invitation (see comment above) 🙏
@editorialbot add @cudmore as reviewer
@cudmore added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @LegrandNico as reviewer
@LegrandNico added to the reviewers list!
Hi @cudmore and @LegrandNico and hi @devnums, it's been tough finding a third reviewer here (🏖️ time?), so let's move this submission to the reviewing step 🌱 . That means that this PRE-REVIEW will be closed and you will be pinged in a new thread - there'll be detailed info how to proceed there as well!
@editorialbot start review
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@devnums<!--end-author-handle-- (Sadegh Mohammadi) Repository: https://github.com/devnums/pyheartlib Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: v1.0.1 Editor: !--editor-->@britta-wstnr<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @cudmore, @LegrandNico Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @devnums. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@devnums if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: