Closed editorialbot closed 2 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=1.55 s (455.6 files/s, 270611.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XML 4 0 0 175010
Fortran 90 100 12075 16681 48025
MATLAB 313 8504 17986 40270
TeX 3 2703 1 25483
Fortran 77 55 1965 9697 22501
Bourne Shell 141 1855 2936 16517
C++ 24 831 760 5870
C/C++ Header 39 631 924 3238
C 7 336 626 1077
Markdown 9 564 0 998
Perl 1 108 44 499
make 9 134 22 341
YAML 1 3 22 108
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 706 29709 49699 339937
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 511
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.tecto.2019.05.004 is OK
- 10.1029/2021JB023519 is OK
- 10.1038/nature19783 is OK
- 10.1186/s40623-021-01543-9 is OK
- 10.1186/s40623-020-01185-3 is OK
- 10.1186/s40623-020-1145-0 is OK
- 10.1002/2016GL070345 is OK
- 10.1029/2019GC008515 is OK
- 10.1785/0120160237 is OK
- 10.1785/0120180058 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1029/2022jb024069 may be a valid DOI for title: Contribution of viscoelastic stress to the synchronization of earthquake cycles on oceanic transform faults
- 10.1016/b978-012387582-2/50038-1 may be a valid DOI for title: Paraview: An end-user tool for large data visualization
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Hi @sbarbot and thanks for your submission. I am going to add it to our waitlist as we need a relevant editor with some availability. In the meantime, please take a look at the suggested missing DOIs above, in case they are relevant. Thanks for your patience.
@kthyng I have updated the DOI number for Shi et al. (2022). However, there is no DOI available for the Paraview handbook, which is a collection of papers.
@kthyng The pre-print of the companion paper "Numerical simulations of seismic cycles in a viscoelastic half-space with the integral method" submitted at J. Geophys. Res. is available at the Earth and Space Science Open Archive.
@jedbrown I want to ping you here and get an invite out to you while I see you have a slot in your editor allocation! Also I'm going out of town later today. Might you be able to take this submission on?
@editorialbot invite @jedbrown as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
Hi All, any update with this submission?
Sorry about the delay; I've been buried and need to decline more service requests. I'm willing to take this, but I'm going to ask for some build and design improvements to support "maintainable extension". This may not be universal, but I feel a clear pattern that JOSS submissions developed in languages other than Fortran have made leaps of progress on composition/usability/packaging over the past few years, and yet here we have lots of near-duplicate code in different directories with copy/modify-the-makefile and limited portability testing. You would not be wrong to say that these practices are accepted by many Fortran programmers, but as someone who wrote a paper on extensibility and "librarization" of simulation software and spends a lot of time dealing with externalities of such practices, it is a bit of a pet issue for me. I understand you may not want to make such changes (and I would understand that choice), but I'd ask that we find a different editor if that is the case.
BTW, I get loads of errors building with gfortran-13 (type and rank mismatches).
I think it's great that you wrote man pages, though "when unicycle/man is in the MANPATH
" must be "when PATH_TO_UNICYCLE/fortran/man
is in the MANPATH
" (adopting a convention I see in hmmvp/readme.txt
, though I don't know if you want to keep that).
@jedbrown, thank you for your thoughtful comments.
I fixed the documentation accordingly. I can work on a CMake
configure/make framework to make the installation more portable. I see the merit in "Librarizing" these codes, but it would have to be for the next version, as it requires substantial efforts that are beyond the scope of this initial submission.
Considering where my community is at this point, the merit of new codes is first and foremost to provide functionality. For example, the mathematics underlying the numerical method took several years to develop. See this example, that example, and the companion paper. I see that other codes, such as pylith, introduced "librarization" in subsequent versions.
I appreciate your comments as an editor. I've learned a lot from you.
BTW, I get loads of errors building with gfortran-13 (type and rank mismatches).
Are these errors or warnings? I also get a lot of warnings for type mismatches for the MPI library for functions like MPI_BCAST. I'm not sure I can fix that.
They are errors. I think you can suppress the error with compiler flags and there are local changes you can make in places (e.g., to handle the rank mismatch errors), but the MPI Forum would say you should use mpi_f08
:
Thank you. I updated the code with USE mpi_f08
. I removed the -fallow-argument-mismatch
compiler option. Using mpi_f08
did not create any issue with this code. However, I tried on other codes and it created problems. For example, the following program does not compile.
PROGRAM test
USE mpi_f08
INTEGER, DIMENSION(2) :: vector
INTEGER :: num_proc,ierr
CALL MPI_INIT(ierr)
CALL MPI_COMM_SIZE(MPI_COMM_WORLD, num_proc, ierr)
CALL MPI_TYPE_COMMIT(vector,ierr)
CALL MPI_FINALIZE(ierr)
END PROGRAM test
That's because vector
has the wrong type. Change its declaration as below and the compiler will accept it (the code is wrong because no type is created here).
TYPE(MPI_Datatype) :: vector
Thank you. Problem solved. I updated the software Motorcycle, which you also oversee as an editor, accordingly.
I will create the CMake installation procedure on September 9, during the CIG-led workshop for community software.
My understanding is that @jedbrown will be the editor for this submission, but it is paused until another submission is finalized. I will add these two changes but let me know if I'm wrong.
@editorialbot add @jedbrown as editor
Assigned! @jedbrown is now the editor
:wave: @jedbrown and @sbarbot - are we ready to start the review on this one? It has been paused since September last year. Please let me know how you would like to continue. Thanks!
@editorialbot reject
Paper rejected.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@sbarbot<!--end-author-handle-- (Sylvain Barbot) Repository: https://bitbucket.org/sbarbot/unicycle Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@jedbrown<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @sbarbot. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@sbarbot if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: