Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=1.64 s (21.3 files/s, 510073.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XML 1 0 0 1703
Jupyter Notebook 7 0 829381 1133
Python 8 373 247 1085
Markdown 4 312 0 729
reStructuredText 9 378 305 318
TeX 1 22 0 225
YAML 3 3 4 34
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 35 1100 829945 5262
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 1301
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90024-2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.eml.2022.101797 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01292 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.1287832 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111755 may be a valid DOI for title: A simple extrapolated predictor for overcoming the starting and tracking issues in the arc-length method for nonlinear structural mechanics
- 10.1103/physrevb.101.064101 may be a valid DOI for title: Navigating the landscape of nonlinear mechanical metamaterials for advanced programmability
- 10.1103/physrevlett.127.138102 may be a valid DOI for title: Elastic instabilities govern the morphogenesis of the optic cup
- 10.1016/b978-0-08-027299-3.50009-1 may be a valid DOI for title: A fast incremental/iterative solution procedure that handles “snap-through”
- 10.1002/nme.2447 may be a valid DOI for title: A dissipation-based arc-length method for robust simulation of brittle and ductile failure
- 10.1016/0020-7683(79)90081-7 may be a valid DOI for title: An incremental approach to the solution of snapping and buckling problems
- 10.1061/jmcea3.0000966 may be a valid DOI for title: Large deflections and stability of elastic frame
- 10.1016/0045-7825(86)90079-4 may be a valid DOI for title: A three-dimensional finite-strain rod model. Part II: Computational aspects
- 10.21105/joss.01539 may be a valid DOI for title: pulse: A python package based on FEniCS for solving problems in cardiac mechanics
- 10.1016/j.softx.2018.10.005 may be a valid DOI for title: FEniCS mechanics: A package for continuum mechanics simulations
- 10.1002/nme.1620140811 may be a valid DOI for title: Incremental displacement algorithms for nonlinear problems
- 10.1115/1.4006992 may be a valid DOI for title: A unified library of nonlinear solution schemes
- 10.1115/1.4005960 may be a valid DOI for title: Wrinkling phenomena in neo-Hookean film/substrate bilayers
- 10.1007/bf03184638 may be a valid DOI for title: Surface instability of rubber in compression
- 10.1137/s0895479899358194 may be a valid DOI for title: A fully asynchronous multifrontal solver using distributed dynamic scheduling
INVALID DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.10.002 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Hello @pprachas, as we are finding an editor and reviewers for your submission, could you take a look at the DOI issues above and address in your paper?
@editorialbot invite @prashjha as editor
Hi @prashjha, this looks to be in your wheelhouse - could you edit this submission?
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90024-2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.eml.2022.101797 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.064101 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.138102 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01292 is OK
- 10.1061/JMCEA3.0000966 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.1287832 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01539 is OK
- 10.1115/1.4006992 is OK
- 10.1115/1.4005960 is OK
- 10.1098/rsta.2016.0163 is OK
- 10.1137/S0895479899358194 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111755 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.10.002 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(81)90108-5 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2447 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(79)90081-7 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(86)90079-4 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2018.10.005 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620140811 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03184638 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90024-2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.eml.2022.101797 is OK
- 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111755 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.064101 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.138102 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cma.2018.10.002 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01292 is OK
- 10.1016/0045-7949(81)90108-5 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.2447 is OK
- 10.1016/0020-7683(79)90081-7 is OK
- 10.1061/JMCEA3.0000966 is OK
- 10.1016/0045-7825(86)90079-4 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.1287832 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01539 is OK
- 10.1016/j.softx.2018.10.005 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.1620140811 is OK
- 10.1115/1.4006992 is OK
- 10.1115/1.4005960 is OK
- 10.1098/rsta.2016.0163 is OK
- 10.1007/BF03184638 is OK
- 10.1137/S0895479899358194 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot assign me as editor
Assigned! @prashjha is now the editor
@pprachas, interesting library! To speed up the process, could you provide the names of a few potential reviewers from this list?
@kyleniemeyer thanks for the invite :)
Hi @prashjha! Thanks for editing this submission!
I looked at the list of reviewers with key words "Finite Element" and "Solid Mechanics" and listed the names of potential reviewers below. In addition, anyone with FEniCS experience would be great but I don’t want to overburden anyone who is currently already reviewing another FEniCS submission.
Potential List of reviewers:
w-luo-academic
kingyin3613
mrbuche
peanutfun
IgorBaratta
thelfer
Hi @w-luo-academic, would you be interested in reviewing this JOSS submission? You can read the draft and also check out their software repository.
The JOSS review process is detailed in this link. I will be happy to help with other questions. Let me know if this interests you.
Hi @kingyin3613, would you be interested in reviewing this JOSS submission? You can read the draft and also check out their software repository.
The JOSS review process is detailed in this link. I will be happy to help with other questions. Let me know if this interests you.
Yes, I am happy to review the submission.
Wen
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 11:25 AM Prashant K. Jha @.***> wrote:
Hi @kingyin3613 https://github.com/kingyin3613, would you be interested in reviewing this JOSS submission? You can read the draft https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.05604/joss.05604/10.21105.joss.05604.pdf and also check out their software repository https://github.com/pprachas/fenics_arclength.
The JOSS review process is detailed in this link https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. I will be happy to help with other questions. Let me know if this interests you.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5604#issuecomment-1660669886, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE7GLMA3AF5342DZCEQUU4LXTEUXXANCNFSM6AAAAAAZYWDEMM . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
--
Wen Luo
Ph.D., Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
Northwestern University
Evanston IL
@w-luo-academic, great. Adding you as a reviewer.
@editorialbot add @w-luo-academic as reviewer
@w-luo-academic added to the reviewers list!
Could you please add my new email address: @.***? My Northwestern email was no longer being used for quite a while.
Thanks, Wen
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 11:37 AM The Open Journals editorial robot < @.***> wrote:
Assigned #5604 https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5604 to @w-luo-academic https://github.com/w-luo-academic.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5604#event-9978894289, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE7GLMERPERGQ74HT7HS7UTXTEWE3ANCNFSM6AAAAAAZYWDEMM . You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: @.***>
--
Wen Luo
Ph.D., Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
Northwestern University
Evanston IL
@w-luo-academic, I think you need to update your GitHub profile. I don't think I have control over this.
Hi @kingyin3613, would you be interested in reviewing this JOSS submission? You can read the draft and also check out their software repository.
The JOSS review process is detailed in this link. I will be happy to help with other questions. Let me know if this interests you.
Yes, I am willing to review this interesting package!
@kingyin3613, great. Thanks for confirming.
@editorialbot add @kingyin3613 as reviewer
@kingyin3613 added to the reviewers list!
@pprachas, we now have two reviewers, @w-luo-academic and @kingyin3613. I will close this issue and create a new issue where the review will take place.
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5727.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@pprachas<!--end-author-handle-- (Peerasait Prachaseree) Repository: https://github.com/pprachas/fenics_arclength Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@prashjha<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @w-luo-academic, @kingyin3613 Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @pprachas. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@pprachas if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: