search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
720 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: PurpleCaffeine: tracking of quantum programs and experiments #5606

Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@IceKhan13<!--end-author-handle-- (Iskandar Sitdikov) Repository: https://github.com/IceKhan13/purplecaffeine Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.2.0 Editor: !--editor-->@lucydot<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @DevenPanchal, @obliviateandsurrender Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/fb9f6af48e22e606dd186f29adcdabd4"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/fb9f6af48e22e606dd186f29adcdabd4/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/fb9f6af48e22e606dd186f29adcdabd4/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/fb9f6af48e22e606dd186f29adcdabd4)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @IceKhan13. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@IceKhan13 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 1 year ago 
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.06 s (1053.4 files/s, 71994.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          29            336            517           1210
Markdown                        10            233              0            678
YAML                            11             22              2            328
Jupyter Notebook                 3              0            552            104
JSON                             2              0              0             63
INI                              1              7              0             50
Dockerfile                       1             10              4             32
TeX                              1              3              0             31
HTML                             1              3              0             28
Bourne Shell                     1              6              0             23
CSS                              1              4              0             23
reStructuredText                 3             36             53             16
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            64            660           1128           2586
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 874

editorialbot commented 1 year ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.2573505 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

kyleniemeyer commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot invite @lucydot as editor

Hi @lucydot, is this something you could edit?

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

lucydot commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Assigned! @lucydot is now the editor

lucydot commented 1 year ago

Hi @kyleniemeyer @IceKhan13 - happy to edit this submission. Though please note I am at a conference for the next week; I will resume editing duties w/c 10th July. In the meantime @IceKhan13 please suggest potential reviewers (more details on this are also above, in the first post).

IceKhan13 commented 1 year ago

Hello @lucydot!

We would like to suggest in no particular order pkairys, WhiteSymmetry, TejasAvinashShetty, hanrui-wang.

Thank you!

lucydot commented 1 year ago

Hi @IceKhan13,

Thanks for the suggestions.

@hanrui-wang, @TejasAvinashShetty, @WhiteSymmetry - are you available to review this submission for JOSS? I believe a couple of you are new reviewers to JOSS, so welcome! Our process is a little different to more traditional journals, being Github-based and completely transparent. If you have any questions about the process, please ask!

lucydot commented 1 year ago

I'll add that there are reviewer docs here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

lucydot commented 1 year ago

Hi @IceKhan13,

I am going on Annual Leave until the 8th of August. I will ping a couple more possible reviewers now, so hopefully we can get a review going in the next couple of days.

@obliviateandsurrender @DevenPanchal @mkareshk - are you available to review this submission for JOSS? I believe a couple of you are new reviewers to JOSS, so welcome! Our process is a little different to more traditional journals, being Github-based and completely transparent. There are more details on the reviewer docs: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

DevenPanchal commented 1 year ago

Yes I available to review

Deven

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023, 5:31 AM Lucy Whalley @.***> wrote:

Hi @IceKhan13 https://github.com/IceKhan13,

I am going on Annual Leave until the 8th of August. I will ping a couple more possible reviewers now, so hopefully we can get a review going in the next couple of days.

@obliviateandsurrender https://github.com/obliviateandsurrender @DevenPanchal https://github.com/DevenPanchal @mkareshk https://github.com/mkareshk - are you available to review this submission for JOSS? I believe a couple of you are new reviewers to JOSS, so welcome! Our process is a little different to more traditional journals, being Github-based and completely transparent. There are more details on the reviewer docs: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5606#issuecomment-1643592823, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADKNMF2DG45DDXWR56GRB53XRD3I7ANCNFSM6AAAAAAZZZK26U . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

obliviateandsurrender commented 1 year ago

Hi @lucydot, I should be able to take out some time to leave a review for this submission.

IceKhan13 commented 1 year ago

Thank you all so much! 🙏

DevenPanchal commented 1 year ago

@lucydot, @IceKhan13 Do you want me to generate and submit the review checklist here in this issue itself?

lucydot commented 1 year ago

That's great @obliviateandsurrender and @DevenPanchal 🎈

@DevenPanchal - not here (this is the _pre-_review), I will add you as reviewers and ask our editorial-bot to generate a review-thread. There will be reviewer instructions at the top of that thread.

The review process at JOSS is a little different in that it is more an on-going conversation between the authors, reviewers, editorialbot and editor. We encourage you to raise and discuss points as they arise rather than listing everything at the end in a single post. Apologies I will not be more hands on for the start of your review (I am on leave until the 8th of August). If questions do arise it may be that you want to hold back on progressing/completing the review until my return. You should be able to get started I think without too many hurdles: also there are reviewer guidelines are here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

lucydot commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @DevenPanchal as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

@DevenPanchal added to the reviewers list!

lucydot commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @obliviateandsurrender as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

@obliviateandsurrender added to the reviewers list!

lucydot commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5673.

DevenPanchal commented 1 year ago

Thanks @lucydot I will get started with the reviewing.

WhiteSymmetry commented 1 year ago

Hi @IceKhan13,

Thanks for the suggestions.

@Hanrui-Wang, @TejasAvinashShetty, @WhiteSymmetry - are you available to review this submission for JOSS? I believe a couple of you are new reviewers to JOSS, so welcome! Our process is a little different to more traditional journals, being Github-based and completely transparent. If you have any questions about the process, please ask!

Top menus are side by side in Python 3.11. Values ​​are only visible when scanned. I also removed the package limitations (== --> >=) and it works fine. p2

purple1