[PRE REVIEW]: LBR-Stack: ROS 2 and Python Integration of KUKA FRI for Med and IIWA Robots

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@mhubii<!--end-author-handle-- (Martin Huber) Repository: https://github.com/lbr-stack/lbr_stack_doc Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@adi3<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @CameronDevine, @bmagyar, @vincentberenz Managing EiC: George K. Thiruvathukal

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c43c82bed833c02503dd47f2637192ef"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c43c82bed833c02503dd47f2637192ef/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c43c82bed833c02503dd47f2637192ef/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c43c82bed833c02503dd47f2637192ef)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mhubii. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The AEiC suggestion for the handling editor is @adi3.

@mhubii if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[adi3]

@CameronDevine absolutely! Thank you for your help!

[adi3]

@editorialbot add @CameronDevine as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@CameronDevine added to the reviewers list!

[mhubii]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

biorbd: A C++, Python and MATLAB library to analyze and simulate the human body biomechanics Submitting author: @pariterre Handling editor: @trallard (Retired) Reviewers: @trallard, @abhishektha Similarity score: 0.8073

Phobos: A tool for creating complex robot models Submitting author: @Amudtogal Handling editor: @gkthiruvathukal (Active) Reviewers: @CameronDevine, @trallard Similarity score: 0.8045

CoreRobotics: An object-oriented C++ library with cross-language wrappers for cross-platform robot control Submitting author: @CoreRobotics Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active) Reviewers: @bmagyar @amjaeger17 Similarity score: 0.8002

kiwiPy: Robust, high-volume, messaging for big-data and computational science workflows Submitting author: @muhrin Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active) Reviewers: @dghoshal-lbl, @uellue Similarity score: 0.7884

The o80 C++ templated toolbox: Designing customized Python APIs for synchronizing realtime processes Submitting author: @vincentberenz Handling editor: @gkthiruvathukal (Active) Reviewers: @traversaro, @vissarion Similarity score: 0.7884

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[adi3]

@abhishektha @Amudtogal @bmagyar @amjaeger17 @muhrin @dghoshal-lbl @uellue @vincentberenz @traversaro @vissarion - would you be available to review this submission? We'd appreciate your help!

[vissarion]

@adi3 I am editing for JOSS, hence there is not time unfortunately for reviewing

[uellue]

Dear @adi3, unfortunately I don't have experience with industrial robots, so I can't review this submission competently.

[bmagyar]

I'm happy to jump in!

[vincentberenz]

@adi3 I am happy to review. I will only have time in January.

[adi3]

@bmagyar @vincentberenz thank you for taking this up!

[adi3]

@editorialbot add @bmagyar as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@bmagyar added to the reviewers list!

[adi3]

@editorialbot add @vincentberenz as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@vincentberenz added to the reviewers list!

[adi3]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @adi3, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot add @username as reviewer

# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@editorialbot assign @username as editor

# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@editorialbot remove editor

# Remind an author, a reviewer or the editor to return to a review after a 
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for version
@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Set a value for repository
@editorialbot set https://github.com/organization/repo as repository

# Set a value for the archive DOI
@editorialbot set set 10.5281/zenodo.6861996 as archive

# Mention the EiCs for the correct track
@editorialbot ping track-eic

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Recommends the submission for acceptance
@editorialbot recommend-accept

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Flag submission with questionable scope
@editorialbot query scope

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

# Creates a post-review checklist with editor and authors tasks
@editorialbot create post-review checklist

# Open the review issue
@editorialbot start review

[adi3]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6138.