search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
720 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: GRDzhadzha: A code for evolving relativistic matter on analytic metric backgrounds #5767

Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@dinatraykova<!--end-author-handle-- (Dina Traykova) Repository: https://github.com/GRChombo/GRDzhadzha.git Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@warrickball<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @rashti-alireza, @ekwessel Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/adcf79f964ea6c1126985118b90f06df"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/adcf79f964ea6c1126985118b90f06df/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/adcf79f964ea6c1126985118b90f06df/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/adcf79f964ea6c1126985118b90f06df)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @dinatraykova. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@dinatraykova if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 1 year ago 
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.05 s (1564.3 files/s, 152526.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C/C++ Header                    47            571            811           2609
TeX                              1             80              0           1000
C++                              6            108            166            713
YAML                             7             37              6            278
Markdown                         2             42              0            163
Python                           3             18              2            163
make                             5             47             27             82
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            71            903           1012           5008
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 2158

editorialbot commented 1 year ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.21105/joss.03703 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104006 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6382/ac6fa9 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4365/ac157b is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083501 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044059 is OK
- 10.1007/JHEP03(2022)111 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021053 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/027 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6382/abb693 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6382/ab939b is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6382/aba28b is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/030 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/01/027 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.063517 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.086014 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/044 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/01/007 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.063014 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.064035 is OK
- 10.1142/S0218271819500147 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.104028 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.083020 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6382/aaf43e is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/005 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6382/aad7f6 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043004 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.044046 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/05/065 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.064036 is OK
- 10.1093/nsr/nwx116 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.151103 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/03/055 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.12.059 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/09/025 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.071102 is OK
- 10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.124059 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.063006 is OK
- 10.1088/0264-9381/32/24/245011 is OK
- 10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.124010 is OK
- 10.1088/0264-9381/29/11/115001 is OK
- 10.1088/0264-9381/29/12/124007 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.064040 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.024005 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.084052 is OK
- 10.1142/9789812834300_0200 is OK
- 10.1088/0264-9381/24/12/S05 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.024027 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.104015 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.111101 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.111102 is OK
- 10.1088/0264-9381/22/17/025 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2006.02.002 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.064011 is OK
- 10.1088/0264-9381/21/6/014 is OK
- 10.1016/S0010-4655(02)00847-0 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4734670 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.024007 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.5428 is OK
- 10.1143/PTPS.90.1 is OK
- 10.1016/0021-9991(84)90073-1 is OK
- 10.1109/21.120081 is OK
- 10.1002/andp.19163540702 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.103014 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.151102 is OK
- 10.1098/rsta.2017.0122 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/03/007 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.024035 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.104055 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6382/ac10ee is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6382/accc6a is OK
- 10.1145/3311790.3396656 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

dinatraykova commented 1 year ago

Reviewers suggestion: Sbozzolo and rashti-alireza

On 17. Aug 2023, at 19:55, The Open Journals editorial robot @.***> wrote:

Submitting author: @dinatraykova https://github.com/dinatraykova (Dina Traykova http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3451-0987) Repository: https://github.com/GRChombo/GRDzhadzha.git Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey

Status

https://joss.theoj.org/papers/adcf79f964ea6c1126985118b90f06df Status badge code:

HTML: Markdown: status Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @dinatraykova https://github.com/dinatraykova. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@dinatraykova https://github.com/dinatraykova if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/lookup that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot https://github.com/editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot https://github.com/editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5767, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFKQH6SJHAXAO3G4N2BH4HTXVZLKJANCNFSM6AAAAAA3UNV4JA. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

dinatraykova commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

dinatraykova commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

dinatraykova commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

dinatraykova commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot commands

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Hello @dinatraykova, here are the things you can ask me to do:


# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
dinatraykova commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot generate preprint

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:page_facing_up: Preprint file created: Find it here in the Artifacts list :page_facing_up:

dfm commented 1 year ago

@dinatraykova — Thank you for your submission and please accept my apologies for the delay in updating this thread! I'm the managing editor for this track and I'm working to assign an editor to take your paper through the review process. Things got a little backed up in August, but I'm hoping we can catch up soon. I'll report back here as soon as I have an editor on board. Thanks for your patience!

warrickball commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Assigned! @warrickball is now the editor

warrickball commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @rashti-alireza as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

@rashti-alireza added to the reviewers list!

warrickball commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot add @ekwessel as reviewer

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

@ekwessel added to the reviewers list!

warrickball commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5956.

rashti-alireza commented 11 months ago

@editorialbot generate my checklist

editorialbot commented 11 months ago

Checklists can only be created once the review has started in the review issue