[PRE REVIEW]: HW2D: A reference implementation of the Hasegawa-Wakatani model for plasma turbulence in fusion reactors

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@the-rccg<!--end-author-handle-- (Robin Greif) Repository: https://github.com/the-rccg/hw2d Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: v0.1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@kyleniemeyer<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @archermarx, @Uddiptaatwork Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f5334c75275080b267d40b0429d711a2"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f5334c75275080b267d40b0429d711a2/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f5334c75275080b267d40b0429d711a2/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f5334c75275080b267d40b0429d711a2)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @the-rccg. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@the-rccg if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.05 s (862.4 files/s, 76653.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          35            508            691           1900
Markdown                         2            104              0            245
YAML                             5             24             19            149
TOML                             1             16              0            147
TeX                              1              8              0            100
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            44            660            710           2541
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1095

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1063/1.871116 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6587/aaa373 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6587/ace993 is OK
- 10.1063/1.871566 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1063/1.5122865 may be a valid DOI for title: Elucidating plasma dynamics in Hasegawa–Wakatani turbulence by information geometry
- 10.1088/1361-6587/abad02 may be a valid DOI for title: Learning how structures form in drift-wave turbulence

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(66)90015-5 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[the-rccg]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @the-rccg, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[the-rccg]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1063/1.871116 is OK
- 10.1006/jcph.1997.5697 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6587/aaa373 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6587/ace993 is OK
- 10.1063/1.5122865 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6587/abad02 is OK
- 10.1063/1.871566 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @the-rccg, thanks for your submission to JOSS. We will use this pre-review issue to assign an editor and find reviewers. Unfortunately, we do not have an editor who is available to handle your submission right now, so I have to place this on our waitlist until someone becomes available.

In the meantime, reviewer suggestions are welcome!

[the-rccg]

@kyleniemeyer thank you very much for opening the pre-review! I'll looking over the reviewer list, it might be useful to broaden the domain since plasma turbulence is an interdisciplinary field including astrophysics (Track 1: AAS) with very similar models and approaches. Maybe an editor from that field is available?

[the-rccg]

I did a quick search found a few potential matches, maybe some of them are willing to give it a look

• Uddipta Bhardwaj works with simulation based inference on astrophysical models which is close to the application and domain
• Thomas A. Marks seems to work on fluid plasma physics too, although very different aspects for thrusters rathe r than fusion
• olgadoronina lists turbulence modeling as a topic, but not much on the JOSS page to go off
• Ashwin Vishnu Mohanan lists CFD turbulence and Python
• Hongyang Zhou seems to work on related topics in Helsinki, but sadly does not have Python listed as a programming language

[the-rccg]

@Uddiptaatwork and @archermarx would you have time to review the submission?

[archermarx]

Yes, I can review this submission, but probably cannot start until Thursday or Friday

[kyleniemeyer]

@the-rccg please hold off on reaching out to reviewers - that is something the editor should be doing.

[kyleniemeyer]

I'm going to go ahead and edit this submission, since we don't have any other editors with availability.

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot assign @kyleniemeyer as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @kyleniemeyer is now the editor

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot add @archermarx as reviewer

Thanks @archermarx for volunteering to review! I'll start the review issue after we find a second reviewer.

[editorialbot]

@archermarx added to the reviewers list!

[kyleniemeyer]

Hello @ashwinvis, are you available to help review this submission to JOSS?

[ashwinvis]

@kyleniemeyer sorry, I already agreed to another review request from JOSS.

[kyleniemeyer]

Hello @Uddiptaatwork, just checking back "officially" - are you able to review this for JOSS? Thanks!

[Uddiptaatwork]

Hello @kyleniemeyer , Sorry for the delay, just concluded another review. Yes, I am available to review this.

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot add @Uddiptaatwork as reviewer

Thanks @Uddiptaatwork!

[editorialbot]

@Uddiptaatwork added to the reviewers list!

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5959.