Closed editorialbot closed 8 months ago
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1126/scirobotics.aav4317 is OK
- 10.1126/sciadv.aat4388 is OK
- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.1038/nmeth.2019 is OK
- 10.1126/scirobotics.aba5726 is OK
- 10.1002/adma.202002047 is OK
- 10.1006/jcis.1996.0217 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-022-09177-x is OK
- 10.1002/nano.202100353 is OK
- 10.1021/acsomega.3c00886 is OK
- 10.1038/nmeth.2089 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7670439 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6234110 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00701 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6234110 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8028030 is OK
- 10.1038/nmeth.2808 is OK
- 10.1115/1.3662552 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
On it.
@editorialbot check references
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1126/scirobotics.aav4317 is OK
- 10.1126/sciadv.aat4388 is OK
- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.1038/nmeth.2019 is OK
- 10.1126/scirobotics.aba5726 is OK
- 10.1002/adma.202002047 is OK
- 10.1006/jcis.1996.0217 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-022-09177-x is OK
- 10.1002/nano.202100353 is OK
- 10.1021/acsomega.3c00886 is OK
- 10.1038/nmeth.2089 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7670439 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6234110 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00701 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6234110 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8028030 is OK
- 10.1038/nmeth.2808 is OK
- 10.1115/1.3662552 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Additional Author Tasks After Review is Complete
- [x] Double check authors and affiliations (including ORCIDs)
- [x] Make a release of the software with the latest changes from the review and post the version number here. This is the version that will be used in the JOSS paper.
- [x] Archive the release on Zenodo/figshare/etc and post the DOI here.
- [x] Make sure that the title and author list (including ORCIDs) in the archive match those in the JOSS paper.
- [x] Make sure that the license listed for the archive is the same as the software license.
In addition:
- [x] Please add a
References
heading prior to the reference list.- [x] Please spell out
USA
asUnited States of America
- [x] The second affiliation contains
|
, can you reformat this? This should perhaps be a comma instead.- [x] Check the potentially invalid DOI's
Latest version: 0.3.2 Zenodo archive DOI:
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Finished. Thanks!
@editorialbot generate pdf
@editorialbot set v0.3.2 as version
Done! version is now v0.3.2
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot set 10.5281/zenodo.10547472 as archive
Done! archive is now 10.5281/zenodo.10547472
@czimm79 please edit the archive title to match the paper title.
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Done.
@czimm79 all seems in order. At this point I will proceed to process this for acceptance in JOSS.
@editorialbot recommend-accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1126/scirobotics.aav4317 is OK
- 10.1126/sciadv.aat4388 is OK
- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.1038/nmeth.2019 is OK
- 10.1126/scirobotics.aba5726 is OK
- 10.1002/adma.202002047 is OK
- 10.1006/jcis.1996.0217 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-022-09177-x is OK
- 10.1002/nano.202100353 is OK
- 10.1021/acsomega.3c00886 is OK
- 10.1038/nmeth.2089 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7670439 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6234110 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00701 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6234110 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8028030 is OK
- 10.1038/nmeth.2808 is OK
- 10.1115/1.3662552 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:warning: Error preparing paper acceptance. The generated XML metadata file is invalid.
ID ref-plas_fonspplutojl_2022 already defined
@czimm79 it looks like you have that reference twice in your .bib file. Can you check this please?
Corrected. Released a new version v0.3.3 with the change. Updated Zenodo with v0.3.3: 10.5281/zenodo.10578580
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Anything else I should do?
@editorialbot set v.0.3.3 as version
Done! version is now v.0.3.3
@editorialbot set 10.5281/zenodo.10578580 as archive
Done! archive is now 10.5281/zenodo.10578580
@czimm79 thanks, note that if any further changes to the paper are needed, there is no need for a new version tag/archive link, if you prefer just sticking with the ones we've set.
@czimm79 I have checked your paper, the archive link, and you repository again. It looks like most is in order, I only have the below point that requires your attention.
@editorialbot recommend-accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1126/scirobotics.aav4317 is OK
- 10.1126/sciadv.aat4388 is OK
- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.1038/nmeth.2019 is OK
- 10.1126/scirobotics.aba5726 is OK
- 10.1002/adma.202002047 is OK
- 10.1006/jcis.1996.0217 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-022-09177-x is OK
- 10.1002/nano.202100353 is OK
- 10.1021/acsomega.3c00886 is OK
- 10.1038/nmeth.2089 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7670439 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00701 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6234110 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8028030 is OK
- 10.1038/nmeth.2808 is OK
- 10.1115/1.3662552 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/bcm-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article
If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/4990, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept
@czimm79 Can you please edit the archive link license to match your software license? Thanks
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Done! Sorry for the delay.
@editorialbot accept
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
Ensure proper citation by uploading a plain text CITATION.cff file to the default branch of your repository.
If using GitHub, a Cite this repository menu will appear in the About section, containing both APA and BibTeX formats. When exported to Zotero using a browser plugin, Zotero will automatically create an entry using the information contained in the .cff file.
You can copy the contents for your CITATION.cff file here:
``` cff-version: "1.2.0" authors: - family-names: Zimmermann given-names: Coy J. - family-names: Neeves given-names: Keith B. - family-names: Marr given-names: David W. M. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10578580 message: If you use this software, please cite our article in the Journal of Open Source Software. preferred-citation: authors: - family-names: Zimmermann given-names: Coy J. - family-names: Neeves given-names: Keith B. - family-names: Marr given-names: David W. M. date-published: 2024-02-13 doi: 10.21105/joss.05804 issn: 2475-9066 issue: 94 journal: Journal of Open Source Software publisher: name: Open Journals start: 5804 title: "MicroTracker.jl: A Julia package for microbot research" type: article url: "https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05804" volume: 9 title: "MicroTracker.jl: A Julia package for microbot research" ```
If the repository is not hosted on GitHub, a .cff file can still be uploaded to set your preferred citation. Users will be able to manually copy and paste the citation.
🐘🐘🐘 👉 Toot for this paper 👈 🐘🐘🐘
🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨
Here's what you must now do:
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
@czimm79 congratulations on this JOSS publication !! :tada:
I'd like to thank the stellar efforts of the reviewers: @roflmaostc, @mkitti, @BioTurboNick! :robot:
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05804/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05804)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05804">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05804/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05804/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05804
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@czimm79<!--end-author-handle-- (Coy Zimmermann) Repository: https://github.com/czimm79/MicroTracker.jl Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v.0.3.3 Editor: !--editor-->@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @roflmaostc, @mkitti, @BioTurboNick Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.10578580
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@roflmaostc & @mkitti & @BioTurboNick, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
📝 Checklist for @roflmaostc
📝 Checklist for @mkitti
📝 Checklist for @BioTurboNick