Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.31 s (273.7 files/s, 72891.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 51 2742 5392 10508
reStructuredText 11 402 169 821
JSON 3 0 0 663
YAML 6 36 7 276
TeX 1 26 0 247
Markdown 2 60 0 212
HTML 3 10 0 94
Jupyter Notebook 3 0 733 66
make 2 19 9 61
Dockerfile 1 19 2 58
INI 1 0 0 3
TOML 1 0 0 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 85 3314 6312 13012
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 2215
Failed to discover a Statement of need
section in paper
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.21105/joss.02505 is OK
- 10.1101/2023.06.16.545371 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1152/jn.00535.2009 may be a valid DOI for title: Quantitative analysis and biophysically realistic neural modeling of the MEG mu rhythm: rhythmogenesis and modulation of sensory-evoked responses
- 10.1007/s10548-021-00838-0 may be a valid DOI for title: Neural mechanisms underlying human auditory evoked responses revealed by human neocortical neurosolver
- 10.1101/2021.04.16.440210 may be a valid DOI for title: Thalamocortical mechanisms regulating the relationship between transient beta events and human tactile perception
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02117 may be a valid DOI for title: A prospective study of the impact of transcranial alternating current stimulation on EEG correlates of somatosensory perception
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118479 may be a valid DOI for title: Laminar dynamics of high amplitude beta bursts in human motor cortex
- 10.1101/2020.05.08.084947 may be a valid DOI for title: Brain Modeling ToolKit: An open source software suite for multiscale modeling of brain circuits
- 10.1101/2023.03.06.531459 may be a valid DOI for title: Laminar Specificity of the Auditory Perceptual Awareness Negativity: A Biophysical Modeling Study
- 10.1016/b978-012264841-0/50054-8 may be a valid DOI for title: Dynamic causal modelling
- 10.3389/fnins.2013.00267 may be a valid DOI for title: MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python
- 10.3389/fninf.2013.00041 may be a valid DOI for title: LFPy: a tool for biophysical simulation of extracellular potentials generated by detailed model neurons
- 10.3389/fninf.2013.00010 may be a valid DOI for title: The Virtual Brain: a simulator of primate brain network dynamics
- 10.1101/2022.12.13.520225 may be a valid DOI for title: Diverse beta burst waveform motifs characterize movement-related cortical dynamics
- 10.1101/2021.10.11.463545 may be a valid DOI for title: Distinct neocortical mechanisms underlie human SI responses to median nerve and laser evoked peripheral activation
- 10.1101/2023.04.17.537118 may be a valid DOI for title: Methods and considerations for estimating parameters in biophysically detailed neural models with simulation based inference
- 10.1103/revmodphys.65.413 may be a valid DOI for title: Magnetoencephalography—theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain
- 10.1109/mcse.2007.55 may be a valid DOI for title: Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment
INVALID DOIs
- None
@ntolley thanks for this submission. I am the AEiC on this track and here to help with the initial steps. I will be looking for a handling editor. For the moment can you check those potentially missing DOIs? :point_up: You can amend your .bib file and rerun (in a clean comment here):
@editorialbot generate pdf
Followed by:
@editorialbot check references
Thanks.
@editorialbot invite @bmcfee as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@bmcfee do you think you can handle this submission? There are very few editors available in this domain at the moment, but I thought your signal processing background might make you a good fit too.
Sure - it's a little outside my wheelhouse, but I can probably stir up some neuro-flavored reviewers.
@editorialbot assign @bmcfee as editor
Assigned! @bmcfee is now the editor
@editorialbot generate pdf
@editorialbot check references
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.7554/eLife.51214 is OK
- 10.1152/jn.00535.2009 is OK
- 10.1007/s10548-021-00838-0 is OK
- 10.1093/cercor/bhab221 is OK
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02117 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118479 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008386 is OK
- 10.7554/eLife.44494 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011003 is OK
- 10.1016/b978-012264841-0/50054-8 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2013.00267 is OK
- 10.1155/2011/852961 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2013.00041 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2013.00010 is OK
- 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102490 is OK
- 10.1101/2021.10.11.463545 is OK
- 10.1101/2023.04.17.537118 is OK
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.65.413 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02505 is OK
- 10.1101/2023.06.16.545371 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1162/neco.1997.9.6.1179 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
Thanks @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman and @bmcfee!
Just updated the DOI's and seems like everything is passing.
Hey @bmcfee If reviewers haven't been decided I'm happy to review this one.
Thanks @isdanni ! I'm still working through my list of invites, but happy to add you on here.
@editorialbot add @isdanni as reviewer
@isdanni added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @neurofractal as reviewer
@neurofractal added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5848.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@ntolley<!--end-author-handle-- (Nicholas Tolley) Repository: https://github.com/jonescompneurolab/hnn-core Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss_paper Version: 0.3 Editor: !--editor-->@bmcfee<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @isdanni, @neurofractal Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ntolley. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@ntolley if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: