Closed editorialbot closed 11 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.58 s (787.9 files/s, 106301.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 260 5452 6213 18700
C 2 682 2377 14010
Qt 42 1 0 11086
JSON 54 9 0 689
TeX 1 60 0 471
SVG 83 2 12 374
Markdown 2 136 5 355
Cython 5 73 109 214
TOML 1 7 11 48
Arduino Sketch 1 14 19 39
Bourne Shell 2 8 18 36
YAML 1 1 4 18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 454 6445 8768 46040
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 2572
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1162/pres.19.1.35 may be a valid DOI for title: Openvibe: An open-source software platform to design, test, and use brain–computer interfaces in real and virtual environments
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.03.020 may be a valid DOI for title: MNE Scan: Software for real-time processing of electrophysiological data
- 10.5040/9781350983816 may be a valid DOI for title: Unity
- 10.1007/3-211-27183-x_1 may be a valid DOI for title: MATLAB
- 10.1017/s0952523810000283 may be a valid DOI for title: Eye fixation–related potentials (EFRPs) during object identification
- 10.1177/1073858405280524 may be a valid DOI for title: The P300: where in the brain is it produced and what does it tell us?
- 10.1088/1741-2552/ac4593 may be a valid DOI for title: Integrating neural and ocular attention reorienting signals in virtual reality
- 10.1145/355017.355028 may be a valid DOI for title: Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols
- 10.1109/34.730558 may be a valid DOI for title: A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis
- 10.1145/3204493.3204538 may be a valid DOI for title: Fixation detection for head-mounted eye tracking based on visual similarity of gaze targets
- 10.1167/12.7.4 may be a valid DOI for title: Fixation-related potentials in visual search: A combined EEG and eye tracking study
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017 may be a valid DOI for title: PsychoPy—psychophysics software in Python
- 10.1101/2022.12.16.520764 may be a valid DOI for title: A scalable and robust system for Audience EEG recordings
- 10.3389/fnins.2020.00900 may be a valid DOI for title: Pyneal: open source real-time fMRI software
- 10.1109/wacv.2016.7477553 may be a valid DOI for title: Openface: an open source facial behavior analysis toolkit
- 10.1088/1741-2560/10/5/056014 may be a valid DOI for title: BCILAB: a platform for brain–computer interface development
- 10.3390/s21238135 may be a valid DOI for title: Pocketable labs for everyone: synchronized multi-sensor data streaming and recording on smartphones with the lab streaming layer
- 10.1007/s10055-023-00799-8 may be a valid DOI for title: A scoping review of the use of lab streaming layer framework in virtual and augmented reality research
- 10.1109/access.2020.2967903 may be a valid DOI for title: BrainKilter: a real-time EEG analysis platform for neurofeedback design and training
- 10.1109/mcse.2010.118 may be a valid DOI for title: Cython: The best of both worlds
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.07.017 may be a valid DOI for title: Toward enhanced P300 speller performance
- 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00261 may be a valid DOI for title: P300 speller performance predictor based on RSVP multi-feature
- 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90149-6 may be a valid DOI for title: Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials
- 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.06.004 may be a valid DOI for title: Combining EEG and eye movement recording in free viewing: Pitfalls and possibilities
- 10.1167/jov.21.1.3 may be a valid DOI for title: Regression-based analysis of combined EEG and eye-tracking data: Theory and applications
- 10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_25 may be a valid DOI for title: 3D deep learning for multi-modal imaging-guided survival time prediction of brain tumor patients
- 10.1002/hbm.22466 may be a valid DOI for title: Pupil diameter covaries with BOLD activity in human locus coeruleus
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109458 may be a valid DOI for title: OpenSync: An open-source platform for synchronizing multiple measures in neuroscience experiments
- 10.3390/brainsci10100687 may be a valid DOI for title: Advances in multimodal emotion recognition based on brain–computer interfaces
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.06.004 may be a valid DOI for title: The effect of multimodal and enriched feedback on SMR-BCI performance
- 10.1201/9781351231954-11 may be a valid DOI for title: BCI and games: playful, experience-oriented learning by vivid feedback?
- 10.1088/1741-2552/acf1cb may be a valid DOI for title: Pupil-linked arousal modulates network-level EEG signatures of attention reorienting during immersive multitasking
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.06.033 may be a valid DOI for title: NEDE: An open-source scripting suite for developing experiments in 3D virtual environments
- 10.1117/1.nph.4.4.041504 may be a valid DOI for title: Turbo-Satori: a neurofeedback and brain–computer interface toolbox for real-time functional near-infrared spectroscopy
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@ApocalyVec thanks for this submission. I am the AEiC on this track and here to help with the initial steps. I will be looking for a handling editor. For the moment can you check those potentially missing DOIs? :point_up: You can amend your .bib file and rerun (in a clean comment here):
@editorialbot generate pdf
Followed by:
@editorialbot check references
Thanks.
@editorialbot invite @mstimberg as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@mstimberg I invited you for another submission too. If we are hitting the max number of papers to handle for you, perhaps you can pick the one you think fits best. Thanks!
Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman thanks for the invitations. I am indeed hitting the max number of papers I'm currently ready to handle. Happy to edit this paper here, but I'll decline for the other one.
@editorialbot assign me as editor
Assigned! @mstimberg is now the editor
@ApocalyVec thanks for this submission. I am the AEiC on this track and here to help with the initial steps. I will be looking for a handling editor. For the moment can you check those potentially missing DOIs? ☝️ You can amend your .bib file and rerun (in a clean comment here):
@editorialbot generate pdf
Followed by:
@editorialbot check references
Thanks.
Thank you @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman for noting this. I just updated paper.bib to include the missing DOIs. Maybe it's a good idea to tell the authors, in the submission instructions, to include them in their .bib file. Although the example paper.bib does have DOIs. The BibTeX generated by Google Scholar doesn't include DOI by default.
@editorialbot generate pdf
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1162/pres.19.1.35 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.03.020 is OK
- 10.1017/S0952523810000283 is OK
- 10.1177/1073858405280524 is OK
- 10.1088/1741-2552/ac4593 is OK
- 10.1145/355017.355028 is OK
- 10.1109/34.730558 is OK
- 10.1145/3204493.3204538 is OK
- 10.1167/12.7.4 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017 is OK
- 10.1101/2022.12.16.520764 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2020.00900 is OK
- 10.1109/WACV.2016.7477553 is OK
- 10.1088/1741-2560/10/5/056014 is OK
- 10.3390/s21238135 is OK
- 10.1007/s10055-023-00799-8 is OK
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2967903 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2010.118 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.07.017 is OK
- 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00261 is OK
- 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90149-6 is OK
- 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.06.004 is OK
- 10.1167/jov.21.1.3 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2209.15182 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_25 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.22466 is OK
- 10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.15 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109458 is OK
- 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00503 is OK
- 10.3390/brainsci10100687 is OK
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.06.004 is OK
- 10.1201/9781351231954 is OK
- 10.1088/1741-2552/acf1cb is OK
- 10.1145/3534601 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.06.033 is OK
- 10.1117/1.NPh.4.4.041504 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.5040/9781350983816 may be a valid DOI for title: Unity
- 10.1007/3-211-27183-x_1 may be a valid DOI for title: MATLAB
INVALID DOIs
- None
Hello @mstimberg, I am able to review this submission.
@editorialbot add @lucask07 as reviewer
Great, thanks a lot @lucask07 ! I'm still waiting for other potential reviewers to reply, and will start the actual review thread as soon as I have secured a second reviewer.
@lucask07 added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @nastaran62 as reviewer
Thanks again for accepting to review @nastaran62. I will start the review process now, the actual review will happen in that new issue.
@nastaran62 added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5854.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@ApocalyVec<!--end-author-handle-- (Ziheng Li) Repository: https://github.com/PhysioLabXR/PhysioLabXR Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-paper Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@mstimberg<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @lucask07, @nastaran62 Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ApocalyVec. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@ApocalyVec if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: